Gay White Duke Official In Homosexual Democrat Conclave Rapes Adopted Black Boy

[Norman Finkelstein]

In article <a9SRu.68559$***@fx24.iad>
"BIG Bird" <***@Teranews.com> wrote:
 
A Laughable Double Standard
The Duke University-Rape Case Nobody Knows About

Oliver Sykes
GUEST COLUMNIST

When the Duke University-lacrosse-rape story broke in the spring
of 2006, it sparked massive media coverage nationwide for more
than two years and endless liberal posturing about white
privilege vs. a disadvantaged black woman – three Duke lacrosse
players were charged with raping and kidnapping a black
stripper. It all turned out to be a lie, as we now know, and the
politically correct house of cards collapsed. The liberal media
quickly moved on with few regrets about a rush to judgment.

Now there is another Duke University-rape story with a strong
evidence trail of e-mails, photos, and videos, as well as
investigative work by the FBI, an Internet Crimes Against
Children task force, the State Bureau of Investigation, and
police forces in Washington, D.C. and in Durham, N.C. But this
time, the liberal media aren’t saying much.

That’s because this case involves a homosexual Duke University
official who does AIDS research; who lives with his partner in a
sexually liberated and eco-friendly housing community; who
adopted two black boys; who allegedly drugged and sodomized one
of the boys; who allegedly broadcast the sodomy online; and who
reportedly offered the 5-year-old boy up to other gay abusers on
the Internet.

This is not a politically correct storyline: ‘Gay White Duke
Official Rapes Adopted Black Boy.’ It doesn’t fit the liberal
worldview. ‘Angry White Male Rapes Black Girl’ does – but that’s
not the story here. Thus the meager media coverage. Let’s look
at what’s known so far.

Frank Lombard, 42, is the associate director of the Center for
Health Policy at Duke University where he does a lot of patients-
with-HIV/AIDS research and brings in grant money: for example,
$4 million in 2007. He also teaches undergraduate courses, as
listed for 2009, including “Introduction to the United States
Health Care System” and “Health Policy Analysis.”

Lombard lives at the Eno Commons with his partner Ken Shipp, a
pharmacist who also works at Duke doing HIV/AIDS research. Eno
Commons is a cohousing neighborhood in Durham, which was
developed by lesbian activist Sherri Zann Rosenthal, also the
assistant city attorney for Durham.

Enos Commons describes itself as “embracing diversity” and
welcoming to “residents of all ages, races, religious beliefs,
and affectional preferences.” It says it is open to lesbian,
gay, bisexual and/or transgender members and has no restrictions
on romantic relations between consenting adults. It also
describes itself as a “Paradise for Children” who “learn what
they live.”

The FBI, the police, and U.S. attorneys first learned about
Lombard through a “confidential source,” as explained in a sworn
statement by Detective Timothy Palchak, who works for the D.C.
Metropolitan Police Department, assigned to the Northern
Virginia Regional Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force.

The confidential source, or “CS,” was facing child pornography
charges and decided to cooperate with investigators about other
people involved “in the sexual abuse and molestation of
children.”

CS stated that he used the Internet-based video chat program
ICUii (I See You Too) to talk with a person with the user name
“cooper2” and “cooperse.” According to Palchak’s statement, the
following was determined:

- Officials with ICUii, under subpoena, “provided information
that the ICUii account of ‘cooper2’ belongs to Frank Lombard.”
ICUii “listed Frank Lombard’s email address” and his telephone
number, and also indicated “that Frank Lombard’s profile
description stated he was interested in ‘perv fam fun,’ a
reference to incestuous child molestation.”

- ICUii also disclosed to the FBI that a customer had
complained back in January 2007 that, in chatting with Lombard
on ICUii, “Lombard told the complainant that he ‘was into
incest’ and that he had adopted two African-American children.”

- “The complainant also explained that Frank Lombard described
himself, in his profile, as being a ‘perv dad for fun.’”

- CS said he met cooper2 about four years ago through ICUii
and they corresponded every few weeks, and CS had seen cooper2
“over webcam as many as one hundred times.”

- CS witnessed cooper2 “perform oral sex on an African-American
child who appeared to be under the age of ten, and [too graphic
to print], all of which activity was displayed to CS using the
individual’s webcam.”

- Cooper 2 also, according to CS, advised “that he lived in the
Raleigh/Durham area of North Carolina; that the child was an
adopted child, one of two adopted African-American children;
that he had a live-in gay male partner who did not participate
in the sexual abuse; and that he had allowed other individuals
to sexually molest the child.”

As the statement continues, Palchak says that he engaged in an
undercover operation using the online chat program Yahoo!
Instant Messenger and chatted with a person using the “display
name ‘F L.’” Sections of Palchak’s statement read:

- FL used the “photo share” feature of Yahoo! Instant Messenger
and sent to the detective “nude photos of himself, which
pictures match the North Carolina driver’s license photograph of
Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

- “User with the display name ‘F L’ stated that he had sexually
molested his adopted, male, African-American child who he had
adopted as an infant and is currently five-years old.”

- “He advised Your affiant [Palchak] in particular that the
child had performed oral sex on him, he had ‘fingered’ the
child, and that he had [too graphic to print].

- “He also advised … that he has met other pedophiles on the
program ICUii at times when he was willing to display his
adopted child on that program.”

- “He further stated that the abuse of the child was easier
when the child was too young to talk or know what was happening,
but that he had drugged the child with Benadryl during the
molestation.”

- “ ‘F L’ invited your affiant to fly to Durham this week in
order to have sexual contact with his 5-year-old adopted child.
‘F L’ stated to Your affiant that there would be no limits on
the sexual activity he could engage in with his 5-year-old
adopted child.”

- “During this conversation, ‘F L’ was fully visible over the
webcam, including his face. ‘F L’ is identical to the North
Carolina driver’s license photograph of Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

Lombard was arrested on June 24. He is charged with offering up
his 5-year-old adopted son for sex to other people (U.S. Code
Section 2422(a). The maximum penalty for such a crime is 20
years imprisonment.

One would think that the arrest of a prominent Duke University
official for such a heinous crime would spark a lot of major
media coverage. After all, this is the same Duke University that
the media (and Duke’s liberal faculty members) went batty over
with the lacrosse-rape story – a story based on one woman’s
unsubstantiated allegation, which quickly fell apart.

But that story was so politically correct – three young white
men allegedly rape a poor, young black woman in the South – the
maniacal liberal media would not let it go. It fit all their
stereotypes and their political agenda.

The gay and eco-friendly Frank Lombard who adopts black boys and
then allegedly sodomizes one of them on Web-cam does not fit the
liberal media’s stereotypes or their agenda.

Let’s look at the numbers. In the 15 days following Lombard’s
arrest, a search of the Nexis news service database (search term
“Frank Lombard” and “Duke University”) shows that 19 news
stories were published. Most of that coverage was in small,
local newspapers and was cursory.

In the 15 days that followed the arrest of two Duke lacrosse
players, on April 18, 2006, there were 1,056 news stories.
(Nexis search for “Duke University” and “lacrosse” and “rape.”)
(The third lacrosse player was not arrested until May 15.)

And in the few weeks prior to those arrests, following the
woman’s Mar. 14, 2006, claim that she was raped, there were an
additional 1,367 stories. All of that included extensive
coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News Channel,
National Public Radio, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, and all the
major newspapers and magazines. The coverage was wall-to-wall.

Yet a fairly prominent gay Duke University official is nabbed in
an FBI child-sex sting and there are 19 news stories. Two Duke
lacrosse players get arrested for supposedly raping a stripper
and there are more than 2,400 stories. There’s something wrong
with this picture.

Does anyone doubt that if a prominent straight man at Duke
University had adopted a young black girl and then sexually
abused her and broadcast the abuse over the Internet, it would
not be big news?

The coverage would again be wall-to-wall.

But here’s the reality. The liberal media support homosexuality.
Stories that in any way undermine the media’s rosy picture of
homosexuality are usually not given wide coverage.

Lombard lives in a sexually progressive commune with his gay
partner. A story that undermines the liberal image of the
committed gay couple – in this case, two highly educated Duke
university employees – living comfortably in suburbia is not to
be promoted.

Lombard adopted two black boys. A story that in any way taints
the liberal picture of gay adoption is not to be promoted, and
especially not promoted if the story has a race component (white
male father, black sons).

Lombard allegedly drugged one of his sons and then sexually
abused him on more than one occasion, and allegedly allowed
others to abuse the boy. A gay man drugging and sodomizing his
own son does not help advance the gay agenda, so it gets little
coverage.

At the same time, the story is so morally revolting it can only
taint anyone or anything associated with it – that includes Duke
University, Eno Commons, the city of Durham, the gay community
in general and the liberal media who rabidly covered the Duke
lacrosse scandal story.

Bottom line for liberal media: White males allegedly rape black
woman in the South equals politically correct story, lots of
coverage. Gay man adopts and then allegedly sodomizes his black
son equals politically incorrect story, very little coverage.

The good news in all this? The two children adopted by Lombard
are now with the North Carolina Department of Social Services.
Hopefully, they will get the counseling they need and, God
willing, a real mother and father to adopt them.

http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2009-0815-
laughable_double_standard.htm

--
For all you assbags who thought voting for that racist jackoff
Obama twice was such a great idea, this perverts' crimes are
your legacy.

Remind the racists at the DOJ about this homosexual white on
black baby crime the American liberal biased media is attempting
to obfuscate.

Email the Eric Holder ("report Zimmerman for racism" DOJ email
address) racist club at: ***@usdoj.gov.

[Norman Finkelstein]

In article <af7a0acb-e94f-4641-aef1-
***@googlegroups.com>
wy <***@myself.com> wrote:
 
A Laughable Double Standard
The Duke University-Rape Case Nobody Knows About

Oliver Sykes
GUEST COLUMNIST

When the Duke University-lacrosse-rape story broke in the spring
of 2006, it sparked massive media coverage nationwide for more
than two years and endless liberal posturing about white
privilege vs. a disadvantaged black woman – three Duke lacrosse
players were charged with raping and kidnapping a black
stripper. It all turned out to be a lie, as we now know, and the
politically correct house of cards collapsed. The liberal media
quickly moved on with few regrets about a rush to judgment.

Now there is another Duke University-rape story with a strong
evidence trail of e-mails, photos, and videos, as well as
investigative work by the FBI, an Internet Crimes Against
Children task force, the State Bureau of Investigation, and
police forces in Washington, D.C. and in Durham, N.C. But this
time, the liberal media aren’t saying much.

That’s because this case involves a homosexual Duke University
official who does AIDS research; who lives with his partner in a
sexually liberated and eco-friendly housing community; who
adopted two black boys; who allegedly drugged and sodomized one
of the boys; who allegedly broadcast the sodomy online; and who
reportedly offered the 5-year-old boy up to other gay abusers on
the Internet.

This is not a politically correct storyline: ‘Gay White Duke
Official Rapes Adopted Black Boy.’ It doesn’t fit the liberal
worldview. ‘Angry White Male Rapes Black Girl’ does – but that’s
not the story here. Thus the meager media coverage. Let’s look
at what’s known so far.

Frank Lombard, 42, is the associate director of the Center for
Health Policy at Duke University where he does a lot of patients-
with-HIV/AIDS research and brings in grant money: for example,
$4 million in 2007. He also teaches undergraduate courses, as
listed for 2009, including “Introduction to the United States
Health Care System” and “Health Policy Analysis.”

Lombard lives at the Eno Commons with his partner Ken Shipp, a
pharmacist who also works at Duke doing HIV/AIDS research. Eno
Commons is a cohousing neighborhood in Durham, which was
developed by lesbian activist Sherri Zann Rosenthal, also the
assistant city attorney for Durham.

Enos Commons describes itself as “embracing diversity” and
welcoming to “residents of all ages, races, religious beliefs,
and affectional preferences.” It says it is open to lesbian,
gay, bisexual and/or transgender members and has no restrictions
on romantic relations between consenting adults. It also
describes itself as a “Paradise for Children” who “learn what
they live.”

The FBI, the police, and U.S. attorneys first learned about
Lombard through a “confidential source,” as explained in a sworn
statement by Detective Timothy Palchak, who works for the D.C.
Metropolitan Police Department, assigned to the Northern
Virginia Regional Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force.

The confidential source, or “CS,” was facing child pornography
charges and decided to cooperate with investigators about other
people involved “in the sexual abuse and molestation of
children.”

CS stated that he used the Internet-based video chat program
ICUii (I See You Too) to talk with a person with the user name
“cooper2” and “cooperse.” According to Palchak’s statement, the
following was determined:

- Officials with ICUii, under subpoena, “provided information
that the ICUii account of ‘cooper2’ belongs to Frank Lombard.”
ICUii “listed Frank Lombard’s email address” and his telephone
number, and also indicated “that Frank Lombard’s profile
description stated he was interested in ‘perv fam fun,’ a
reference to incestuous child molestation.”

- ICUii also disclosed to the FBI that a customer had
complained back in January 2007 that, in chatting with Lombard
on ICUii, “Lombard told the complainant that he ‘was into
incest’ and that he had adopted two African-American children.”

- “The complainant also explained that Frank Lombard described
himself, in his profile, as being a ‘perv dad for fun.’”

- CS said he met cooper2 about four years ago through ICUii
and they corresponded every few weeks, and CS had seen cooper2
“over webcam as many as one hundred times.”

- CS witnessed cooper2 “perform oral sex on an African-American
child who appeared to be under the age of ten, and [too graphic
to print], all of which activity was displayed to CS using the
individual’s webcam.”

- Cooper 2 also, according to CS, advised “that he lived in the
Raleigh/Durham area of North Carolina; that the child was an
adopted child, one of two adopted African-American children;
that he had a live-in gay male partner who did not participate
in the sexual abuse; and that he had allowed other individuals
to sexually molest the child.”

As the statement continues, Palchak says that he engaged in an
undercover operation using the online chat program Yahoo!
Instant Messenger and chatted with a person using the “display
name ‘F L.’” Sections of Palchak’s statement read:

- FL used the “photo share” feature of Yahoo! Instant Messenger
and sent to the detective “nude photos of himself, which
pictures match the North Carolina driver’s license photograph of
Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

- “User with the display name ‘F L’ stated that he had sexually
molested his adopted, male, African-American child who he had
adopted as an infant and is currently five-years old.”

- “He advised Your affiant [Palchak] in particular that the
child had performed oral sex on him, he had ‘fingered’ the
child, and that he had [too graphic to print].

- “He also advised … that he has met other pedophiles on the
program ICUii at times when he was willing to display his
adopted child on that program.”

- “He further stated that the abuse of the child was easier
when the child was too young to talk or know what was happening,
but that he had drugged the child with Benadryl during the
molestation.”

- “ ‘F L’ invited your affiant to fly to Durham this week in
order to have sexual contact with his 5-year-old adopted child.
‘F L’ stated to Your affiant that there would be no limits on
the sexual activity he could engage in with his 5-year-old
adopted child.”

- “During this conversation, ‘F L’ was fully visible over the
webcam, including his face. ‘F L’ is identical to the North
Carolina driver’s license photograph of Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

Lombard was arrested on June 24. He is charged with offering up
his 5-year-old adopted son for sex to other people (U.S. Code
Section 2422(a). The maximum penalty for such a crime is 20
years imprisonment.

One would think that the arrest of a prominent Duke University
official for such a heinous crime would spark a lot of major
media coverage. After all, this is the same Duke University that
the media (and Duke’s liberal faculty members) went batty over
with the lacrosse-rape story – a story based on one woman’s
unsubstantiated allegation, which quickly fell apart.

But that story was so politically correct – three young white
men allegedly rape a poor, young black woman in the South – the
maniacal liberal media would not let it go. It fit all their
stereotypes and their political agenda.

The gay and eco-friendly Frank Lombard who adopts black boys and
then allegedly sodomizes one of them on Web-cam does not fit the
liberal media’s stereotypes or their agenda.

Let’s look at the numbers. In the 15 days following Lombard’s
arrest, a search of the Nexis news service database (search term
“Frank Lombard” and “Duke University”) shows that 19 news
stories were published. Most of that coverage was in small,
local newspapers and was cursory.

In the 15 days that followed the arrest of two Duke lacrosse
players, on April 18, 2006, there were 1,056 news stories.
(Nexis search for “Duke University” and “lacrosse” and “rape.”)
(The third lacrosse player was not arrested until May 15.)

And in the few weeks prior to those arrests, following the
woman’s Mar. 14, 2006, claim that she was raped, there were an
additional 1,367 stories. All of that included extensive
coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News Channel,
National Public Radio, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, and all the
major newspapers and magazines. The coverage was wall-to-wall.

Yet a fairly prominent gay Duke University official is nabbed in
an FBI child-sex sting and there are 19 news stories. Two Duke
lacrosse players get arrested for supposedly raping a stripper
and there are more than 2,400 stories. There’s something wrong
with this picture.

Does anyone doubt that if a prominent straight man at Duke
University had adopted a young black girl and then sexually
abused her and broadcast the abuse over the Internet, it would
not be big news?

The coverage would again be wall-to-wall.

But here’s the reality. The liberal media support homosexuality.
Stories that in any way undermine the media’s rosy picture of
homosexuality are usually not given wide coverage.

Lombard lives in a sexually progressive commune with his gay
partner. A story that undermines the liberal image of the
committed gay couple – in this case, two highly educated Duke
university employees – living comfortably in suburbia is not to
be promoted.

Lombard adopted two black boys. A story that in any way taints
the liberal picture of gay adoption is not to be promoted, and
especially not promoted if the story has a race component (white
male father, black sons).

Lombard allegedly drugged one of his sons and then sexually
abused him on more than one occasion, and allegedly allowed
others to abuse the boy. A gay man drugging and sodomizing his
own son does not help advance the gay agenda, so it gets little
coverage.

At the same time, the story is so morally revolting it can only
taint anyone or anything associated with it – that includes Duke
University, Eno Commons, the city of Durham, the gay community
in general and the liberal media who rabidly covered the Duke
lacrosse scandal story.

Bottom line for liberal media: White males allegedly rape black
woman in the South equals politically correct story, lots of
coverage. Gay man adopts and then allegedly sodomizes his black
son equals politically incorrect story, very little coverage.

The good news in all this? The two children adopted by Lombard
are now with the North Carolina Department of Social Services.
Hopefully, they will get the counseling they need and, God
willing, a real mother and father to adopt them.

http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2009-0815-
laughable_double_standard.htm

--
For all you assbags who thought voting for that racist jackoff
Obama twice was such a great idea, this perverts' crimes are
your legacy.

Remind the racists at the DOJ about this homosexual white on
black baby crime the American liberal biased media is attempting
to obfuscate.

Email the Eric Holder ("report Zimmerman for racism" DOJ email
address) racist club at: ***@usdoj.gov.

[Norman Finkelstein]

In article <***@4ax.com>
***@Jurgis.net wrote:
 
A Laughable Double Standard
The Duke University-Rape Case Nobody Knows About

Oliver Sykes
GUEST COLUMNIST

When the Duke University-lacrosse-rape story broke in the spring
of 2006, it sparked massive media coverage nationwide for more
than two years and endless liberal posturing about white
privilege vs. a disadvantaged black woman – three Duke lacrosse
players were charged with raping and kidnapping a black
stripper. It all turned out to be a lie, as we now know, and the
politically correct house of cards collapsed. The liberal media
quickly moved on with few regrets about a rush to judgment.

Now there is another Duke University-rape story with a strong
evidence trail of e-mails, photos, and videos, as well as
investigative work by the FBI, an Internet Crimes Against
Children task force, the State Bureau of Investigation, and
police forces in Washington, D.C. and in Durham, N.C. But this
time, the liberal media aren’t saying much.

That’s because this case involves a homosexual Duke University
official who does AIDS research; who lives with his partner in a
sexually liberated and eco-friendly housing community; who
adopted two black boys; who allegedly drugged and sodomized one
of the boys; who allegedly broadcast the sodomy online; and who
reportedly offered the 5-year-old boy up to other gay abusers on
the Internet.

This is not a politically correct storyline: ‘Gay White Duke
Official Rapes Adopted Black Boy.’ It doesn’t fit the liberal
worldview. ‘Angry White Male Rapes Black Girl’ does – but that’s
not the story here. Thus the meager media coverage. Let’s look
at what’s known so far.

Frank Lombard, 42, is the associate director of the Center for
Health Policy at Duke University where he does a lot of patients-
with-HIV/AIDS research and brings in grant money: for example,
$4 million in 2007. He also teaches undergraduate courses, as
listed for 2009, including “Introduction to the United States
Health Care System” and “Health Policy Analysis.”

Lombard lives at the Eno Commons with his partner Ken Shipp, a
pharmacist who also works at Duke doing HIV/AIDS research. Eno
Commons is a cohousing neighborhood in Durham, which was
developed by lesbian activist Sherri Zann Rosenthal, also the
assistant city attorney for Durham.

Enos Commons describes itself as “embracing diversity” and
welcoming to “residents of all ages, races, religious beliefs,
and affectional preferences.” It says it is open to lesbian,
gay, bisexual and/or transgender members and has no restrictions
on romantic relations between consenting adults. It also
describes itself as a “Paradise for Children” who “learn what
they live.”

The FBI, the police, and U.S. attorneys first learned about
Lombard through a “confidential source,” as explained in a sworn
statement by Detective Timothy Palchak, who works for the D.C.
Metropolitan Police Department, assigned to the Northern
Virginia Regional Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force.

The confidential source, or “CS,” was facing child pornography
charges and decided to cooperate with investigators about other
people involved “in the sexual abuse and molestation of
children.”

CS stated that he used the Internet-based video chat program
ICUii (I See You Too) to talk with a person with the user name
“cooper2” and “cooperse.” According to Palchak’s statement, the
following was determined:

- Officials with ICUii, under subpoena, “provided information
that the ICUii account of ‘cooper2’ belongs to Frank Lombard.”
ICUii “listed Frank Lombard’s email address” and his telephone
number, and also indicated “that Frank Lombard’s profile
description stated he was interested in ‘perv fam fun,’ a
reference to incestuous child molestation.”

- ICUii also disclosed to the FBI that a customer had
complained back in January 2007 that, in chatting with Lombard
on ICUii, “Lombard told the complainant that he ‘was into
incest’ and that he had adopted two African-American children.”

- “The complainant also explained that Frank Lombard described
himself, in his profile, as being a ‘perv dad for fun.’”

- CS said he met cooper2 about four years ago through ICUii
and they corresponded every few weeks, and CS had seen cooper2
“over webcam as many as one hundred times.”

- CS witnessed cooper2 “perform oral sex on an African-American
child who appeared to be under the age of ten, and [too graphic
to print], all of which activity was displayed to CS using the
individual’s webcam.”

- Cooper 2 also, according to CS, advised “that he lived in the
Raleigh/Durham area of North Carolina; that the child was an
adopted child, one of two adopted African-American children;
that he had a live-in gay male partner who did not participate
in the sexual abuse; and that he had allowed other individuals
to sexually molest the child.”

As the statement continues, Palchak says that he engaged in an
undercover operation using the online chat program Yahoo!
Instant Messenger and chatted with a person using the “display
name ‘F L.’” Sections of Palchak’s statement read:

- FL used the “photo share” feature of Yahoo! Instant Messenger
and sent to the detective “nude photos of himself, which
pictures match the North Carolina driver’s license photograph of
Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

- “User with the display name ‘F L’ stated that he had sexually
molested his adopted, male, African-American child who he had
adopted as an infant and is currently five-years old.”

- “He advised Your affiant [Palchak] in particular that the
child had performed oral sex on him, he had ‘fingered’ the
child, and that he had [too graphic to print].

- “He also advised … that he has met other pedophiles on the
program ICUii at times when he was willing to display his
adopted child on that program.”

- “He further stated that the abuse of the child was easier
when the child was too young to talk or know what was happening,
but that he had drugged the child with Benadryl during the
molestation.”

- “ ‘F L’ invited your affiant to fly to Durham this week in
order to have sexual contact with his 5-year-old adopted child.
‘F L’ stated to Your affiant that there would be no limits on
the sexual activity he could engage in with his 5-year-old
adopted child.”

- “During this conversation, ‘F L’ was fully visible over the
webcam, including his face. ‘F L’ is identical to the North
Carolina driver’s license photograph of Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

Lombard was arrested on June 24. He is charged with offering up
his 5-year-old adopted son for sex to other people (U.S. Code
Section 2422(a). The maximum penalty for such a crime is 20
years imprisonment.

One would think that the arrest of a prominent Duke University
official for such a heinous crime would spark a lot of major
media coverage. After all, this is the same Duke University that
the media (and Duke’s liberal faculty members) went batty over
with the lacrosse-rape story – a story based on one woman’s
unsubstantiated allegation, which quickly fell apart.

But that story was so politically correct – three young white
men allegedly rape a poor, young black woman in the South – the
maniacal liberal media would not let it go. It fit all their
stereotypes and their political agenda.

The gay and eco-friendly Frank Lombard who adopts black boys and
then allegedly sodomizes one of them on Web-cam does not fit the
liberal media’s stereotypes or their agenda.

Let’s look at the numbers. In the 15 days following Lombard’s
arrest, a search of the Nexis news service database (search term
“Frank Lombard” and “Duke University”) shows that 19 news
stories were published. Most of that coverage was in small,
local newspapers and was cursory.

In the 15 days that followed the arrest of two Duke lacrosse
players, on April 18, 2006, there were 1,056 news stories.
(Nexis search for “Duke University” and “lacrosse” and “rape.”)
(The third lacrosse player was not arrested until May 15.)

And in the few weeks prior to those arrests, following the
woman’s Mar. 14, 2006, claim that she was raped, there were an
additional 1,367 stories. All of that included extensive
coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News Channel,
National Public Radio, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, and all the
major newspapers and magazines. The coverage was wall-to-wall.

Yet a fairly prominent gay Duke University official is nabbed in
an FBI child-sex sting and there are 19 news stories. Two Duke
lacrosse players get arrested for supposedly raping a stripper
and there are more than 2,400 stories. There’s something wrong
with this picture.

Does anyone doubt that if a prominent straight man at Duke
University had adopted a young black girl and then sexually
abused her and broadcast the abuse over the Internet, it would
not be big news?

The coverage would again be wall-to-wall.

But here’s the reality. The liberal media support homosexuality.
Stories that in any way undermine the media’s rosy picture of
homosexuality are usually not given wide coverage.

Lombard lives in a sexually progressive commune with his gay
partner. A story that undermines the liberal image of the
committed gay couple – in this case, two highly educated Duke
university employees – living comfortably in suburbia is not to
be promoted.

Lombard adopted two black boys. A story that in any way taints
the liberal picture of gay adoption is not to be promoted, and
especially not promoted if the story has a race component (white
male father, black sons).

Lombard allegedly drugged one of his sons and then sexually
abused him on more than one occasion, and allegedly allowed
others to abuse the boy. A gay man drugging and sodomizing his
own son does not help advance the gay agenda, so it gets little
coverage.

At the same time, the story is so morally revolting it can only
taint anyone or anything associated with it – that includes Duke
University, Eno Commons, the city of Durham, the gay community
in general and the liberal media who rabidly covered the Duke
lacrosse scandal story.

Bottom line for liberal media: White males allegedly rape black
woman in the South equals politically correct story, lots of
coverage. Gay man adopts and then allegedly sodomizes his black
son equals politically incorrect story, very little coverage.

The good news in all this? The two children adopted by Lombard
are now with the North Carolina Department of Social Services.
Hopefully, they will get the counseling they need and, God
willing, a real mother and father to adopt them.

http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2009-0815-
laughable_double_standard.htm

--
For all you assbags who thought voting for that racist jackoff
Obama twice was such a great idea, this perverts' crimes are
your legacy.

Remind the racists at the DOJ about this homosexual white on
black baby crime the American liberal biased media is attempting
to obfuscate.

Email the Eric Holder ("report Zimmerman for racism" DOJ email
address) racist club at: ***@usdoj.gov.

[Norman Finkelstein]

In article <***@4ax.com>
***@Jurgis.net wrote:
 
A Laughable Double Standard
The Duke University-Rape Case Nobody Knows About

Oliver Sykes
GUEST COLUMNIST

When the Duke University-lacrosse-rape story broke in the spring
of 2006, it sparked massive media coverage nationwide for more
than two years and endless liberal posturing about white
privilege vs. a disadvantaged black woman – three Duke lacrosse
players were charged with raping and kidnapping a black
stripper. It all turned out to be a lie, as we now know, and the
politically correct house of cards collapsed. The liberal media
quickly moved on with few regrets about a rush to judgment.

Now there is another Duke University-rape story with a strong
evidence trail of e-mails, photos, and videos, as well as
investigative work by the FBI, an Internet Crimes Against
Children task force, the State Bureau of Investigation, and
police forces in Washington, D.C. and in Durham, N.C. But this
time, the liberal media aren’t saying much.

That’s because this case involves a homosexual Duke University
official who does AIDS research; who lives with his partner in a
sexually liberated and eco-friendly housing community; who
adopted two black boys; who allegedly drugged and sodomized one
of the boys; who allegedly broadcast the sodomy online; and who
reportedly offered the 5-year-old boy up to other gay abusers on
the Internet.

This is not a politically correct storyline: ‘Gay White Duke
Official Rapes Adopted Black Boy.’ It doesn’t fit the liberal
worldview. ‘Angry White Male Rapes Black Girl’ does – but that’s
not the story here. Thus the meager media coverage. Let’s look
at what’s known so far.

Frank Lombard, 42, is the associate director of the Center for
Health Policy at Duke University where he does a lot of patients-
with-HIV/AIDS research and brings in grant money: for example,
$4 million in 2007. He also teaches undergraduate courses, as
listed for 2009, including “Introduction to the United States
Health Care System” and “Health Policy Analysis.”

Lombard lives at the Eno Commons with his partner Ken Shipp, a
pharmacist who also works at Duke doing HIV/AIDS research. Eno
Commons is a cohousing neighborhood in Durham, which was
developed by lesbian activist Sherri Zann Rosenthal, also the
assistant city attorney for Durham.

Enos Commons describes itself as “embracing diversity” and
welcoming to “residents of all ages, races, religious beliefs,
and affectional preferences.” It says it is open to lesbian,
gay, bisexual and/or transgender members and has no restrictions
on romantic relations between consenting adults. It also
describes itself as a “Paradise for Children” who “learn what
they live.”

The FBI, the police, and U.S. attorneys first learned about
Lombard through a “confidential source,” as explained in a sworn
statement by Detective Timothy Palchak, who works for the D.C.
Metropolitan Police Department, assigned to the Northern
Virginia Regional Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force.

The confidential source, or “CS,” was facing child pornography
charges and decided to cooperate with investigators about other
people involved “in the sexual abuse and molestation of
children.”

CS stated that he used the Internet-based video chat program
ICUii (I See You Too) to talk with a person with the user name
“cooper2” and “cooperse.” According to Palchak’s statement, the
following was determined:

- Officials with ICUii, under subpoena, “provided information
that the ICUii account of ‘cooper2’ belongs to Frank Lombard.”
ICUii “listed Frank Lombard’s email address” and his telephone
number, and also indicated “that Frank Lombard’s profile
description stated he was interested in ‘perv fam fun,’ a
reference to incestuous child molestation.”

- ICUii also disclosed to the FBI that a customer had
complained back in January 2007 that, in chatting with Lombard
on ICUii, “Lombard told the complainant that he ‘was into
incest’ and that he had adopted two African-American children.”

- “The complainant also explained that Frank Lombard described
himself, in his profile, as being a ‘perv dad for fun.’”

- CS said he met cooper2 about four years ago through ICUii
and they corresponded every few weeks, and CS had seen cooper2
“over webcam as many as one hundred times.”

- CS witnessed cooper2 “perform oral sex on an African-American
child who appeared to be under the age of ten, and [too graphic
to print], all of which activity was displayed to CS using the
individual’s webcam.”

- Cooper 2 also, according to CS, advised “that he lived in the
Raleigh/Durham area of North Carolina; that the child was an
adopted child, one of two adopted African-American children;
that he had a live-in gay male partner who did not participate
in the sexual abuse; and that he had allowed other individuals
to sexually molest the child.”

As the statement continues, Palchak says that he engaged in an
undercover operation using the online chat program Yahoo!
Instant Messenger and chatted with a person using the “display
name ‘F L.’” Sections of Palchak’s statement read:

- FL used the “photo share” feature of Yahoo! Instant Messenger
and sent to the detective “nude photos of himself, which
pictures match the North Carolina driver’s license photograph of
Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

- “User with the display name ‘F L’ stated that he had sexually
molested his adopted, male, African-American child who he had
adopted as an infant and is currently five-years old.”

- “He advised Your affiant [Palchak] in particular that the
child had performed oral sex on him, he had ‘fingered’ the
child, and that he had [too graphic to print].

- “He also advised … that he has met other pedophiles on the
program ICUii at times when he was willing to display his
adopted child on that program.”

- “He further stated that the abuse of the child was easier
when the child was too young to talk or know what was happening,
but that he had drugged the child with Benadryl during the
molestation.”

- “ ‘F L’ invited your affiant to fly to Durham this week in
order to have sexual contact with his 5-year-old adopted child.
‘F L’ stated to Your affiant that there would be no limits on
the sexual activity he could engage in with his 5-year-old
adopted child.”

- “During this conversation, ‘F L’ was fully visible over the
webcam, including his face. ‘F L’ is identical to the North
Carolina driver’s license photograph of Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

Lombard was arrested on June 24. He is charged with offering up
his 5-year-old adopted son for sex to other people (U.S. Code
Section 2422(a). The maximum penalty for such a crime is 20
years imprisonment.

One would think that the arrest of a prominent Duke University
official for such a heinous crime would spark a lot of major
media coverage. After all, this is the same Duke University that
the media (and Duke’s liberal faculty members) went batty over
with the lacrosse-rape story – a story based on one woman’s
unsubstantiated allegation, which quickly fell apart.

But that story was so politically correct – three young white
men allegedly rape a poor, young black woman in the South – the
maniacal liberal media would not let it go. It fit all their
stereotypes and their political agenda.

The gay and eco-friendly Frank Lombard who adopts black boys and
then allegedly sodomizes one of them on Web-cam does not fit the
liberal media’s stereotypes or their agenda.

Let’s look at the numbers. In the 15 days following Lombard’s
arrest, a search of the Nexis news service database (search term
“Frank Lombard” and “Duke University”) shows that 19 news
stories were published. Most of that coverage was in small,
local newspapers and was cursory.

In the 15 days that followed the arrest of two Duke lacrosse
players, on April 18, 2006, there were 1,056 news stories.
(Nexis search for “Duke University” and “lacrosse” and “rape.”)
(The third lacrosse player was not arrested until May 15.)

And in the few weeks prior to those arrests, following the
woman’s Mar. 14, 2006, claim that she was raped, there were an
additional 1,367 stories. All of that included extensive
coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News Channel,
National Public Radio, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, and all the
major newspapers and magazines. The coverage was wall-to-wall.

Yet a fairly prominent gay Duke University official is nabbed in
an FBI child-sex sting and there are 19 news stories. Two Duke
lacrosse players get arrested for supposedly raping a stripper
and there are more than 2,400 stories. There’s something wrong
with this picture.

Does anyone doubt that if a prominent straight man at Duke
University had adopted a young black girl and then sexually
abused her and broadcast the abuse over the Internet, it would
not be big news?

The coverage would again be wall-to-wall.

But here’s the reality. The liberal media support homosexuality.
Stories that in any way undermine the media’s rosy picture of
homosexuality are usually not given wide coverage.

Lombard lives in a sexually progressive commune with his gay
partner. A story that undermines the liberal image of the
committed gay couple – in this case, two highly educated Duke
university employees – living comfortably in suburbia is not to
be promoted.

Lombard adopted two black boys. A story that in any way taints
the liberal picture of gay adoption is not to be promoted, and
especially not promoted if the story has a race component (white
male father, black sons).

Lombard allegedly drugged one of his sons and then sexually
abused him on more than one occasion, and allegedly allowed
others to abuse the boy. A gay man drugging and sodomizing his
own son does not help advance the gay agenda, so it gets little
coverage.

At the same time, the story is so morally revolting it can only
taint anyone or anything associated with it – that includes Duke
University, Eno Commons, the city of Durham, the gay community
in general and the liberal media who rabidly covered the Duke
lacrosse scandal story.

Bottom line for liberal media: White males allegedly rape black
woman in the South equals politically correct story, lots of
coverage. Gay man adopts and then allegedly sodomizes his black
son equals politically incorrect story, very little coverage.

The good news in all this? The two children adopted by Lombard
are now with the North Carolina Department of Social Services.
Hopefully, they will get the counseling they need and, God
willing, a real mother and father to adopt them.

http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2009-0815-
laughable_double_standard.htm

--
For all you assbags who thought voting for that racist jackoff
Obama twice was such a great idea, this perverts' crimes are
your legacy.

Remind the racists at the DOJ about this homosexual white on
black baby crime the American liberal biased media is attempting
to obfuscate.

Email the Eric Holder ("report Zimmerman for racism" DOJ email
address) racist club at: ***@usdoj.gov.

[David 1950]

It was all that blubber that did them in




"Norman Finkelstein" <***@my-deja.com> wrote in message news:***@dizum.com...
: In article <***@4ax.com>
: ***@Jurgis.net wrote:
:
: A Laughable Double Standard
: The Duke University-Rape Case Nobody Knows About
:
: Oliver Sykes
: GUEST COLUMNIST
:
: When the Duke University-lacrosse-rape story broke in the spring
: of 2006, it sparked massive media coverage nationwide for more
: than two years and endless liberal posturing about white
: privilege vs. a disadvantaged black woman - three Duke lacrosse
: players were charged with raping and kidnapping a black
: stripper. It all turned out to be a lie, as we now know, and the
: politically correct house of cards collapsed. The liberal media
: quickly moved on with few regrets about a rush to judgment.
:
: Now there is another Duke University-rape story with a strong
: evidence trail of e-mails, photos, and videos, as well as
: investigative work by the FBI, an Internet Crimes Against
: Children task force, the State Bureau of Investigation, and
: police forces in Washington, D.C. and in Durham, N.C. But this
: time, the liberal media aren't saying much.
:
: That's because this case involves a homosexual Duke University
: official who does AIDS research; who lives with his partner in a
: sexually liberated and eco-friendly housing community; who
: adopted two black boys; who allegedly drugged and sodomized one
: of the boys; who allegedly broadcast the sodomy online; and who
: reportedly offered the 5-year-old boy up to other gay abusers on
: the Internet.
:
: This is not a politically correct storyline: 'Gay White Duke
: Official Rapes Adopted Black Boy.' It doesn't fit the liberal
: worldview. 'Angry White Male Rapes Black Girl' does - but that's
: not the story here. Thus the meager media coverage. Let's look
: at what's known so far.
:
: Frank Lombard, 42, is the associate director of the Center for
: Health Policy at Duke University where he does a lot of patients-
: with-HIV/AIDS research and brings in grant money: for example,
: $4 million in 2007. He also teaches undergraduate courses, as
: listed for 2009, including "Introduction to the United States
: Health Care System" and "Health Policy Analysis."
:
: Lombard lives at the Eno Commons with his partner Ken Shipp, a
: pharmacist who also works at Duke doing HIV/AIDS research. Eno
: Commons is a cohousing neighborhood in Durham, which was
: developed by lesbian activist Sherri Zann Rosenthal, also the
: assistant city attorney for Durham.
:
: Enos Commons describes itself as "embracing diversity" and
: welcoming to "residents of all ages, races, religious beliefs,
: and affectional preferences." It says it is open to lesbian,
: gay, bisexual and/or transgender members and has no restrictions
: on romantic relations between consenting adults. It also
: describes itself as a "Paradise for Children" who "learn what
: they live."
:
: The FBI, the police, and U.S. attorneys first learned about
: Lombard through a "confidential source," as explained in a sworn
: statement by Detective Timothy Palchak, who works for the D.C.
: Metropolitan Police Department, assigned to the Northern
: Virginia Regional Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force.
:
: The confidential source, or "CS," was facing child pornography
: charges and decided to cooperate with investigators about other
: people involved "in the sexual abuse and molestation of
: children."
:
: CS stated that he used the Internet-based video chat program
: ICUii (I See You Too) to talk with a person with the user name
: "cooper2" and "cooperse." According to Palchak's statement, the
: following was determined:
:
: - Officials with ICUii, under subpoena, "provided information
: that the ICUii account of 'cooper2' belongs to Frank Lombard."
: ICUii "listed Frank Lombard's email address" and his telephone
: number, and also indicated "that Frank Lombard's profile
: description stated he was interested in 'perv fam fun,' a
: reference to incestuous child molestation."
:
: - ICUii also disclosed to the FBI that a customer had
: complained back in January 2007 that, in chatting with Lombard
: on ICUii, "Lombard told the complainant that he 'was into
: incest' and that he had adopted two African-American children."
:
: - "The complainant also explained that Frank Lombard described
: himself, in his profile, as being a 'perv dad for fun.'"
:
: - CS said he met cooper2 about four years ago through ICUii
: and they corresponded every few weeks, and CS had seen cooper2
: "over webcam as many as one hundred times."
:
: - CS witnessed cooper2 "perform oral sex on an African-American
: child who appeared to be under the age of ten, and [too graphic
: to print], all of which activity was displayed to CS using the
: individual's webcam."
:
: - Cooper 2 also, according to CS, advised "that he lived in the
: Raleigh/Durham area of North Carolina; that the child was an
: adopted child, one of two adopted African-American children;
: that he had a live-in gay male partner who did not participate
: in the sexual abuse; and that he had allowed other individuals
: to sexually molest the child."
:
: As the statement continues, Palchak says that he engaged in an
: undercover operation using the online chat program Yahoo!
: Instant Messenger and chatted with a person using the "display
: name 'F L.'" Sections of Palchak's statement read:
:
: - FL used the "photo share" feature of Yahoo! Instant Messenger
: and sent to the detective "nude photos of himself, which
: pictures match the North Carolina driver's license photograph of
: Frank Mccorkle Lombard."
:
: - "User with the display name 'F L' stated that he had sexually
: molested his adopted, male, African-American child who he had
: adopted as an infant and is currently five-years old."
:
: - "He advised Your affiant [Palchak] in particular that the
: child had performed oral sex on him, he had 'fingered' the
: child, and that he had [too graphic to print].
:
: - "He also advised . that he has met other pedophiles on the
: program ICUii at times when he was willing to display his
: adopted child on that program."
:
: - "He further stated that the abuse of the child was easier
: when the child was too young to talk or know what was happening,
: but that he had drugged the child with Benadryl during the
: molestation."
:
: - " 'F L' invited your affiant to fly to Durham this week in
: order to have sexual contact with his 5-year-old adopted child.
: 'F L' stated to Your affiant that there would be no limits on
: the sexual activity he could engage in with his 5-year-old
: adopted child."
:
: - "During this conversation, 'F L' was fully visible over the
: webcam, including his face. 'F L' is identical to the North
: Carolina driver's license photograph of Frank Mccorkle Lombard."
:
: Lombard was arrested on June 24. He is charged with offering up
: his 5-year-old adopted son for sex to other people (U.S. Code
: Section 2422(a). The maximum penalty for such a crime is 20
: years imprisonment.
:
: One would think that the arrest of a prominent Duke University
: official for such a heinous crime would spark a lot of major
: media coverage. After all, this is the same Duke University that
: the media (and Duke's liberal faculty members) went batty over
: with the lacrosse-rape story - a story based on one woman's
: unsubstantiated allegation, which quickly fell apart.
:
: But that story was so politically correct - three young white
: men allegedly rape a poor, young black woman in the South - the
: maniacal liberal media would not let it go. It fit all their
: stereotypes and their political agenda.
:
: The gay and eco-friendly Frank Lombard who adopts black boys and
: then allegedly sodomizes one of them on Web-cam does not fit the
: liberal media's stereotypes or their agenda.
:
: Let's look at the numbers. In the 15 days following Lombard's
: arrest, a search of the Nexis news service database (search term
: "Frank Lombard" and "Duke University") shows that 19 news
: stories were published. Most of that coverage was in small,
: local newspapers and was cursory.
:
: In the 15 days that followed the arrest of two Duke lacrosse
: players, on April 18, 2006, there were 1,056 news stories.
: (Nexis search for "Duke University" and "lacrosse" and "rape.")
: (The third lacrosse player was not arrested until May 15.)
:
: And in the few weeks prior to those arrests, following the
: woman's Mar. 14, 2006, claim that she was raped, there were an
: additional 1,367 stories. All of that included extensive
: coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News Channel,
: National Public Radio, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, and all the
: major newspapers and magazines. The coverage was wall-to-wall.
:
: Yet a fairly prominent gay Duke University official is nabbed in
: an FBI child-sex sting and there are 19 news stories. Two Duke
: lacrosse players get arrested for supposedly raping a stripper
: and there are more than 2,400 stories. There's something wrong
: with this picture.
:
: Does anyone doubt that if a prominent straight man at Duke
: University had adopted a young black girl and then sexually
: abused her and broadcast the abuse over the Internet, it would
: not be big news?
:
: The coverage would again be wall-to-wall.
:
: But here's the reality. The liberal media support homosexuality.
: Stories that in any way undermine the media's rosy picture of
: homosexuality are usually not given wide coverage.
:
: Lombard lives in a sexually progressive commune with his gay
: partner. A story that undermines the liberal image of the
: committed gay couple - in this case, two highly educated Duke
: university employees - living comfortably in suburbia is not to
: be promoted.
:
: Lombard adopted two black boys. A story that in any way taints
: the liberal picture of gay adoption is not to be promoted, and
: especially not promoted if the story has a race component (white
: male father, black sons).
:
: Lombard allegedly drugged one of his sons and then sexually
: abused him on more than one occasion, and allegedly allowed
: others to abuse the boy. A gay man drugging and sodomizing his
: own son does not help advance the gay agenda, so it gets little
: coverage.
:
: At the same time, the story is so morally revolting it can only
: taint anyone or anything associated with it - that includes Duke
: University, Eno Commons, the city of Durham, the gay community
: in general and the liberal media who rabidly covered the Duke
: lacrosse scandal story.
:
: Bottom line for liberal media: White males allegedly rape black
: woman in the South equals politically correct story, lots of
: coverage. Gay man adopts and then allegedly sodomizes his black
: son equals politically incorrect story, very little coverage.
:
: The good news in all this? The two children adopted by Lombard
: are now with the North Carolina Department of Social Services.
: Hopefully, they will get the counseling they need and, God
: willing, a real mother and father to adopt them.
:
: http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2009-0815-
: laughable_double_standard.htm
:
: --
: For all you assbags who thought voting for that racist jackoff
: Obama twice was such a great idea, this perverts' crimes are
: your legacy.
:
: Remind the racists at the DOJ about this homosexual white on
: black baby crime the American liberal biased media is attempting
: to obfuscate.
:
: Email the Eric Holder ("report Zimmerman for racism" DOJ email
: address) racist club at: ***@usdoj.gov.
:

[Norman Finkelstein]

In article <09e422bb-b943-413f-b806-
***@googlegroups.com>
***@gmail.com wrote:
 
A Laughable Double Standard
The Duke University-Rape Case Nobody Knows About

Oliver Sykes
GUEST COLUMNIST

When the Duke University-lacrosse-rape story broke in the spring
of 2006, it sparked massive media coverage nationwide for more
than two years and endless liberal posturing about white
privilege vs. a disadvantaged black woman – three Duke lacrosse
players were charged with raping and kidnapping a black
stripper. It all turned out to be a lie, as we now know, and the
politically correct house of cards collapsed. The liberal media
quickly moved on with few regrets about a rush to judgment.

Now there is another Duke University-rape story with a strong
evidence trail of e-mails, photos, and videos, as well as
investigative work by the FBI, an Internet Crimes Against
Children task force, the State Bureau of Investigation, and
police forces in Washington, D.C. and in Durham, N.C. But this
time, the liberal media aren’t saying much.

That’s because this case involves a homosexual Duke University
official who does AIDS research; who lives with his partner in a
sexually liberated and eco-friendly housing community; who
adopted two black boys; who allegedly drugged and sodomized one
of the boys; who allegedly broadcast the sodomy online; and who
reportedly offered the 5-year-old boy up to other gay abusers on
the Internet.

This is not a politically correct storyline: ‘Gay White Duke
Official Rapes Adopted Black Boy.’ It doesn’t fit the liberal
worldview. ‘Angry White Male Rapes Black Girl’ does – but that’s
not the story here. Thus the meager media coverage. Let’s look
at what’s known so far.

Frank Lombard, 42, is the associate director of the Center for
Health Policy at Duke University where he does a lot of patients-
with-HIV/AIDS research and brings in grant money: for example,
$4 million in 2007. He also teaches undergraduate courses, as
listed for 2009, including “Introduction to the United States
Health Care System” and “Health Policy Analysis.”

Lombard lives at the Eno Commons with his partner Ken Shipp, a
pharmacist who also works at Duke doing HIV/AIDS research. Eno
Commons is a cohousing neighborhood in Durham, which was
developed by lesbian activist Sherri Zann Rosenthal, also the
assistant city attorney for Durham.

Enos Commons describes itself as “embracing diversity” and
welcoming to “residents of all ages, races, religious beliefs,
and affectional preferences.” It says it is open to lesbian,
gay, bisexual and/or transgender members and has no restrictions
on romantic relations between consenting adults. It also
describes itself as a “Paradise for Children” who “learn what
they live.”

The FBI, the police, and U.S. attorneys first learned about
Lombard through a “confidential source,” as explained in a sworn
statement by Detective Timothy Palchak, who works for the D.C.
Metropolitan Police Department, assigned to the Northern
Virginia Regional Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force.

The confidential source, or “CS,” was facing child pornography
charges and decided to cooperate with investigators about other
people involved “in the sexual abuse and molestation of
children.”

CS stated that he used the Internet-based video chat program
ICUii (I See You Too) to talk with a person with the user name
“cooper2” and “cooperse.” According to Palchak’s statement, the
following was determined:

- Officials with ICUii, under subpoena, “provided information
that the ICUii account of ‘cooper2’ belongs to Frank Lombard.”
ICUii “listed Frank Lombard’s email address” and his telephone
number, and also indicated “that Frank Lombard’s profile
description stated he was interested in ‘perv fam fun,’ a
reference to incestuous child molestation.”

- ICUii also disclosed to the FBI that a customer had
complained back in January 2007 that, in chatting with Lombard
on ICUii, “Lombard told the complainant that he ‘was into
incest’ and that he had adopted two African-American children.”

- “The complainant also explained that Frank Lombard described
himself, in his profile, as being a ‘perv dad for fun.’”

- CS said he met cooper2 about four years ago through ICUii
and they corresponded every few weeks, and CS had seen cooper2
“over webcam as many as one hundred times.”

- CS witnessed cooper2 “perform oral sex on an African-American
child who appeared to be under the age of ten, and [too graphic
to print], all of which activity was displayed to CS using the
individual’s webcam.”

- Cooper 2 also, according to CS, advised “that he lived in the
Raleigh/Durham area of North Carolina; that the child was an
adopted child, one of two adopted African-American children;
that he had a live-in gay male partner who did not participate
in the sexual abuse; and that he had allowed other individuals
to sexually molest the child.”

As the statement continues, Palchak says that he engaged in an
undercover operation using the online chat program Yahoo!
Instant Messenger and chatted with a person using the “display
name ‘F L.’” Sections of Palchak’s statement read:

- FL used the “photo share” feature of Yahoo! Instant Messenger
and sent to the detective “nude photos of himself, which
pictures match the North Carolina driver’s license photograph of
Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

- “User with the display name ‘F L’ stated that he had sexually
molested his adopted, male, African-American child who he had
adopted as an infant and is currently five-years old.”

- “He advised Your affiant [Palchak] in particular that the
child had performed oral sex on him, he had ‘fingered’ the
child, and that he had [too graphic to print].

- “He also advised … that he has met other pedophiles on the
program ICUii at times when he was willing to display his
adopted child on that program.”

- “He further stated that the abuse of the child was easier
when the child was too young to talk or know what was happening,
but that he had drugged the child with Benadryl during the
molestation.”

- “ ‘F L’ invited your affiant to fly to Durham this week in
order to have sexual contact with his 5-year-old adopted child.
‘F L’ stated to Your affiant that there would be no limits on
the sexual activity he could engage in with his 5-year-old
adopted child.”

- “During this conversation, ‘F L’ was fully visible over the
webcam, including his face. ‘F L’ is identical to the North
Carolina driver’s license photograph of Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

Lombard was arrested on June 24. He is charged with offering up
his 5-year-old adopted son for sex to other people (U.S. Code
Section 2422(a). The maximum penalty for such a crime is 20
years imprisonment.

One would think that the arrest of a prominent Duke University
official for such a heinous crime would spark a lot of major
media coverage. After all, this is the same Duke University that
the media (and Duke’s liberal faculty members) went batty over
with the lacrosse-rape story – a story based on one woman’s
unsubstantiated allegation, which quickly fell apart.

But that story was so politically correct – three young white
men allegedly rape a poor, young black woman in the South – the
maniacal liberal media would not let it go. It fit all their
stereotypes and their political agenda.

The gay and eco-friendly Frank Lombard who adopts black boys and
then allegedly sodomizes one of them on Web-cam does not fit the
liberal media’s stereotypes or their agenda.

Let’s look at the numbers. In the 15 days following Lombard’s
arrest, a search of the Nexis news service database (search term
“Frank Lombard” and “Duke University”) shows that 19 news
stories were published. Most of that coverage was in small,
local newspapers and was cursory.

In the 15 days that followed the arrest of two Duke lacrosse
players, on April 18, 2006, there were 1,056 news stories.
(Nexis search for “Duke University” and “lacrosse” and “rape.”)
(The third lacrosse player was not arrested until May 15.)

And in the few weeks prior to those arrests, following the
woman’s Mar. 14, 2006, claim that she was raped, there were an
additional 1,367 stories. All of that included extensive
coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News Channel,
National Public Radio, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, and all the
major newspapers and magazines. The coverage was wall-to-wall.

Yet a fairly prominent gay Duke University official is nabbed in
an FBI child-sex sting and there are 19 news stories. Two Duke
lacrosse players get arrested for supposedly raping a stripper
and there are more than 2,400 stories. There’s something wrong
with this picture.

Does anyone doubt that if a prominent straight man at Duke
University had adopted a young black girl and then sexually
abused her and broadcast the abuse over the Internet, it would
not be big news?

The coverage would again be wall-to-wall.

But here’s the reality. The liberal media support homosexuality.
Stories that in any way undermine the media’s rosy picture of
homosexuality are usually not given wide coverage.

Lombard lives in a sexually progressive commune with his gay
partner. A story that undermines the liberal image of the
committed gay couple – in this case, two highly educated Duke
university employees – living comfortably in suburbia is not to
be promoted.

Lombard adopted two black boys. A story that in any way taints
the liberal picture of gay adoption is not to be promoted, and
especially not promoted if the story has a race component (white
male father, black sons).

Lombard allegedly drugged one of his sons and then sexually
abused him on more than one occasion, and allegedly allowed
others to abuse the boy. A gay man drugging and sodomizing his
own son does not help advance the gay agenda, so it gets little
coverage.

At the same time, the story is so morally revolting it can only
taint anyone or anything associated with it – that includes Duke
University, Eno Commons, the city of Durham, the gay community
in general and the liberal media who rabidly covered the Duke
lacrosse scandal story.

Bottom line for liberal media: White males allegedly rape black
woman in the South equals politically correct story, lots of
coverage. Gay man adopts and then allegedly sodomizes his black
son equals politically incorrect story, very little coverage.

The good news in all this? The two children adopted by Lombard
are now with the North Carolina Department of Social Services.
Hopefully, they will get the counseling they need and, God
willing, a real mother and father to adopt them.

http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2009-0815-
laughable_double_standard.htm

--
For all you assbags who thought voting for that racist jackoff
Obama twice was such a great idea, this perverts' crimes are
your legacy.

Remind the racists at the DOJ about this homosexual white on
black baby crime the American liberal biased media is attempting
to obfuscate.

Email the Eric Holder ("report Zimmerman for racism" DOJ email
address) racist club at: ***@usdoj.gov.

[Norman Finkelstein]

In article <***@4ax.com>
***@Jurgis.net wrote:
 
A Laughable Double Standard
The Duke University-Rape Case Nobody Knows About

Oliver Sykes
GUEST COLUMNIST

When the Duke University-lacrosse-rape story broke in the spring
of 2006, it sparked massive media coverage nationwide for more
than two years and endless liberal posturing about white
privilege vs. a disadvantaged black woman – three Duke lacrosse
players were charged with raping and kidnapping a black
stripper. It all turned out to be a lie, as we now know, and the
politically correct house of cards collapsed. The liberal media
quickly moved on with few regrets about a rush to judgment.

Now there is another Duke University-rape story with a strong
evidence trail of e-mails, photos, and videos, as well as
investigative work by the FBI, an Internet Crimes Against
Children task force, the State Bureau of Investigation, and
police forces in Washington, D.C. and in Durham, N.C. But this
time, the liberal media aren’t saying much.

That’s because this case involves a homosexual Duke University
official who does AIDS research; who lives with his partner in a
sexually liberated and eco-friendly housing community; who
adopted two black boys; who allegedly drugged and sodomized one
of the boys; who allegedly broadcast the sodomy online; and who
reportedly offered the 5-year-old boy up to other gay abusers on
the Internet.

This is not a politically correct storyline: ‘Gay White Duke
Official Rapes Adopted Black Boy.’ It doesn’t fit the liberal
worldview. ‘Angry White Male Rapes Black Girl’ does – but that’s
not the story here. Thus the meager media coverage. Let’s look
at what’s known so far.

Frank Lombard, 42, is the associate director of the Center for
Health Policy at Duke University where he does a lot of patients-
with-HIV/AIDS research and brings in grant money: for example,
$4 million in 2007. He also teaches undergraduate courses, as
listed for 2009, including “Introduction to the United States
Health Care System” and “Health Policy Analysis.”

Lombard lives at the Eno Commons with his partner Ken Shipp, a
pharmacist who also works at Duke doing HIV/AIDS research. Eno
Commons is a cohousing neighborhood in Durham, which was
developed by lesbian activist Sherri Zann Rosenthal, also the
assistant city attorney for Durham.

Enos Commons describes itself as “embracing diversity” and
welcoming to “residents of all ages, races, religious beliefs,
and affectional preferences.” It says it is open to lesbian,
gay, bisexual and/or transgender members and has no restrictions
on romantic relations between consenting adults. It also
describes itself as a “Paradise for Children” who “learn what
they live.”

The FBI, the police, and U.S. attorneys first learned about
Lombard through a “confidential source,” as explained in a sworn
statement by Detective Timothy Palchak, who works for the D.C.
Metropolitan Police Department, assigned to the Northern
Virginia Regional Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force.

The confidential source, or “CS,” was facing child pornography
charges and decided to cooperate with investigators about other
people involved “in the sexual abuse and molestation of
children.”

CS stated that he used the Internet-based video chat program
ICUii (I See You Too) to talk with a person with the user name
“cooper2” and “cooperse.” According to Palchak’s statement, the
following was determined:

- Officials with ICUii, under subpoena, “provided information
that the ICUii account of ‘cooper2’ belongs to Frank Lombard.”
ICUii “listed Frank Lombard’s email address” and his telephone
number, and also indicated “that Frank Lombard’s profile
description stated he was interested in ‘perv fam fun,’ a
reference to incestuous child molestation.”

- ICUii also disclosed to the FBI that a customer had
complained back in January 2007 that, in chatting with Lombard
on ICUii, “Lombard told the complainant that he ‘was into
incest’ and that he had adopted two African-American children.”

- “The complainant also explained that Frank Lombard described
himself, in his profile, as being a ‘perv dad for fun.’”

- CS said he met cooper2 about four years ago through ICUii
and they corresponded every few weeks, and CS had seen cooper2
“over webcam as many as one hundred times.”

- CS witnessed cooper2 “perform oral sex on an African-American
child who appeared to be under the age of ten, and [too graphic
to print], all of which activity was displayed to CS using the
individual’s webcam.”

- Cooper 2 also, according to CS, advised “that he lived in the
Raleigh/Durham area of North Carolina; that the child was an
adopted child, one of two adopted African-American children;
that he had a live-in gay male partner who did not participate
in the sexual abuse; and that he had allowed other individuals
to sexually molest the child.”

As the statement continues, Palchak says that he engaged in an
undercover operation using the online chat program Yahoo!
Instant Messenger and chatted with a person using the “display
name ‘F L.’” Sections of Palchak’s statement read:

- FL used the “photo share” feature of Yahoo! Instant Messenger
and sent to the detective “nude photos of himself, which
pictures match the North Carolina driver’s license photograph of
Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

- “User with the display name ‘F L’ stated that he had sexually
molested his adopted, male, African-American child who he had
adopted as an infant and is currently five-years old.”

- “He advised Your affiant [Palchak] in particular that the
child had performed oral sex on him, he had ‘fingered’ the
child, and that he had [too graphic to print].

- “He also advised … that he has met other pedophiles on the
program ICUii at times when he was willing to display his
adopted child on that program.”

- “He further stated that the abuse of the child was easier
when the child was too young to talk or know what was happening,
but that he had drugged the child with Benadryl during the
molestation.”

- “ ‘F L’ invited your affiant to fly to Durham this week in
order to have sexual contact with his 5-year-old adopted child.
‘F L’ stated to Your affiant that there would be no limits on
the sexual activity he could engage in with his 5-year-old
adopted child.”

- “During this conversation, ‘F L’ was fully visible over the
webcam, including his face. ‘F L’ is identical to the North
Carolina driver’s license photograph of Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

Lombard was arrested on June 24. He is charged with offering up
his 5-year-old adopted son for sex to other people (U.S. Code
Section 2422(a). The maximum penalty for such a crime is 20
years imprisonment.

One would think that the arrest of a prominent Duke University
official for such a heinous crime would spark a lot of major
media coverage. After all, this is the same Duke University that
the media (and Duke’s liberal faculty members) went batty over
with the lacrosse-rape story – a story based on one woman’s
unsubstantiated allegation, which quickly fell apart.

But that story was so politically correct – three young white
men allegedly rape a poor, young black woman in the South – the
maniacal liberal media would not let it go. It fit all their
stereotypes and their political agenda.

The gay and eco-friendly Frank Lombard who adopts black boys and
then allegedly sodomizes one of them on Web-cam does not fit the
liberal media’s stereotypes or their agenda.

Let’s look at the numbers. In the 15 days following Lombard’s
arrest, a search of the Nexis news service database (search term
“Frank Lombard” and “Duke University”) shows that 19 news
stories were published. Most of that coverage was in small,
local newspapers and was cursory.

In the 15 days that followed the arrest of two Duke lacrosse
players, on April 18, 2006, there were 1,056 news stories.
(Nexis search for “Duke University” and “lacrosse” and “rape.”)
(The third lacrosse player was not arrested until May 15.)

And in the few weeks prior to those arrests, following the
woman’s Mar. 14, 2006, claim that she was raped, there were an
additional 1,367 stories. All of that included extensive
coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News Channel,
National Public Radio, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, and all the
major newspapers and magazines. The coverage was wall-to-wall.

Yet a fairly prominent gay Duke University official is nabbed in
an FBI child-sex sting and there are 19 news stories. Two Duke
lacrosse players get arrested for supposedly raping a stripper
and there are more than 2,400 stories. There’s something wrong
with this picture.

Does anyone doubt that if a prominent straight man at Duke
University had adopted a young black girl and then sexually
abused her and broadcast the abuse over the Internet, it would
not be big news?

The coverage would again be wall-to-wall.

But here’s the reality. The liberal media support homosexuality.
Stories that in any way undermine the media’s rosy picture of
homosexuality are usually not given wide coverage.

Lombard lives in a sexually progressive commune with his gay
partner. A story that undermines the liberal image of the
committed gay couple – in this case, two highly educated Duke
university employees – living comfortably in suburbia is not to
be promoted.

Lombard adopted two black boys. A story that in any way taints
the liberal picture of gay adoption is not to be promoted, and
especially not promoted if the story has a race component (white
male father, black sons).

Lombard allegedly drugged one of his sons and then sexually
abused him on more than one occasion, and allegedly allowed
others to abuse the boy. A gay man drugging and sodomizing his
own son does not help advance the gay agenda, so it gets little
coverage.

At the same time, the story is so morally revolting it can only
taint anyone or anything associated with it – that includes Duke
University, Eno Commons, the city of Durham, the gay community
in general and the liberal media who rabidly covered the Duke
lacrosse scandal story.

Bottom line for liberal media: White males allegedly rape black
woman in the South equals politically correct story, lots of
coverage. Gay man adopts and then allegedly sodomizes his black
son equals politically incorrect story, very little coverage.

The good news in all this? The two children adopted by Lombard
are now with the North Carolina Department of Social Services.
Hopefully, they will get the counseling they need and, God
willing, a real mother and father to adopt them.

http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2009-0815-
laughable_double_standard.htm

--
For all you assbags who thought voting for that racist jackoff
Obama twice was such a great idea, this perverts' crimes are
your legacy.

Remind the racists at the DOJ about this homosexual white on
black baby crime the American liberal biased media is attempting
to obfuscate.

Email the Eric Holder ("report Zimmerman for racism" DOJ email
address) racist club at: ***@usdoj.gov.

[Norman Finkelstein]

In article <22f64f4c-3932-4b48-b1cd-
***@googlegroups.com>
"Tom Sr." <***@gmail.com> wrote:
 
A Laughable Double Standard
The Duke University-Rape Case Nobody Knows About

Oliver Sykes
GUEST COLUMNIST

When the Duke University-lacrosse-rape story broke in the spring
of 2006, it sparked massive media coverage nationwide for more
than two years and endless liberal posturing about white
privilege vs. a disadvantaged black woman – three Duke lacrosse
players were charged with raping and kidnapping a black
stripper. It all turned out to be a lie, as we now know, and the
politically correct house of cards collapsed. The liberal media
quickly moved on with few regrets about a rush to judgment.

Now there is another Duke University-rape story with a strong
evidence trail of e-mails, photos, and videos, as well as
investigative work by the FBI, an Internet Crimes Against
Children task force, the State Bureau of Investigation, and
police forces in Washington, D.C. and in Durham, N.C. But this
time, the liberal media aren’t saying much.

That’s because this case involves a homosexual Duke University
official who does AIDS research; who lives with his partner in a
sexually liberated and eco-friendly housing community; who
adopted two black boys; who allegedly drugged and sodomized one
of the boys; who allegedly broadcast the sodomy online; and who
reportedly offered the 5-year-old boy up to other gay abusers on
the Internet.

This is not a politically correct storyline: ‘Gay White Duke
Official Rapes Adopted Black Boy.’ It doesn’t fit the liberal
worldview. ‘Angry White Male Rapes Black Girl’ does – but that’s
not the story here. Thus the meager media coverage. Let’s look
at what’s known so far.

Frank Lombard, 42, is the associate director of the Center for
Health Policy at Duke University where he does a lot of patients-
with-HIV/AIDS research and brings in grant money: for example,
$4 million in 2007. He also teaches undergraduate courses, as
listed for 2009, including “Introduction to the United States
Health Care System” and “Health Policy Analysis.”

Lombard lives at the Eno Commons with his partner Ken Shipp, a
pharmacist who also works at Duke doing HIV/AIDS research. Eno
Commons is a cohousing neighborhood in Durham, which was
developed by lesbian activist Sherri Zann Rosenthal, also the
assistant city attorney for Durham.

Enos Commons describes itself as “embracing diversity” and
welcoming to “residents of all ages, races, religious beliefs,
and affectional preferences.” It says it is open to lesbian,
gay, bisexual and/or transgender members and has no restrictions
on romantic relations between consenting adults. It also
describes itself as a “Paradise for Children” who “learn what
they live.”

The FBI, the police, and U.S. attorneys first learned about
Lombard through a “confidential source,” as explained in a sworn
statement by Detective Timothy Palchak, who works for the D.C.
Metropolitan Police Department, assigned to the Northern
Virginia Regional Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force.

The confidential source, or “CS,” was facing child pornography
charges and decided to cooperate with investigators about other
people involved “in the sexual abuse and molestation of
children.”

CS stated that he used the Internet-based video chat program
ICUii (I See You Too) to talk with a person with the user name
“cooper2” and “cooperse.” According to Palchak’s statement, the
following was determined:

- Officials with ICUii, under subpoena, “provided information
that the ICUii account of ‘cooper2’ belongs to Frank Lombard.”
ICUii “listed Frank Lombard’s email address” and his telephone
number, and also indicated “that Frank Lombard’s profile
description stated he was interested in ‘perv fam fun,’ a
reference to incestuous child molestation.”

- ICUii also disclosed to the FBI that a customer had
complained back in January 2007 that, in chatting with Lombard
on ICUii, “Lombard told the complainant that he ‘was into
incest’ and that he had adopted two African-American children.”

- “The complainant also explained that Frank Lombard described
himself, in his profile, as being a ‘perv dad for fun.’”

- CS said he met cooper2 about four years ago through ICUii
and they corresponded every few weeks, and CS had seen cooper2
“over webcam as many as one hundred times.”

- CS witnessed cooper2 “perform oral sex on an African-American
child who appeared to be under the age of ten, and [too graphic
to print], all of which activity was displayed to CS using the
individual’s webcam.”

- Cooper 2 also, according to CS, advised “that he lived in the
Raleigh/Durham area of North Carolina; that the child was an
adopted child, one of two adopted African-American children;
that he had a live-in gay male partner who did not participate
in the sexual abuse; and that he had allowed other individuals
to sexually molest the child.”

As the statement continues, Palchak says that he engaged in an
undercover operation using the online chat program Yahoo!
Instant Messenger and chatted with a person using the “display
name ‘F L.’” Sections of Palchak’s statement read:

- FL used the “photo share” feature of Yahoo! Instant Messenger
and sent to the detective “nude photos of himself, which
pictures match the North Carolina driver’s license photograph of
Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

- “User with the display name ‘F L’ stated that he had sexually
molested his adopted, male, African-American child who he had
adopted as an infant and is currently five-years old.”

- “He advised Your affiant [Palchak] in particular that the
child had performed oral sex on him, he had ‘fingered’ the
child, and that he had [too graphic to print].

- “He also advised … that he has met other pedophiles on the
program ICUii at times when he was willing to display his
adopted child on that program.”

- “He further stated that the abuse of the child was easier
when the child was too young to talk or know what was happening,
but that he had drugged the child with Benadryl during the
molestation.”

- “ ‘F L’ invited your affiant to fly to Durham this week in
order to have sexual contact with his 5-year-old adopted child.
‘F L’ stated to Your affiant that there would be no limits on
the sexual activity he could engage in with his 5-year-old
adopted child.”

- “During this conversation, ‘F L’ was fully visible over the
webcam, including his face. ‘F L’ is identical to the North
Carolina driver’s license photograph of Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

Lombard was arrested on June 24. He is charged with offering up
his 5-year-old adopted son for sex to other people (U.S. Code
Section 2422(a). The maximum penalty for such a crime is 20
years imprisonment.

One would think that the arrest of a prominent Duke University
official for such a heinous crime would spark a lot of major
media coverage. After all, this is the same Duke University that
the media (and Duke’s liberal faculty members) went batty over
with the lacrosse-rape story – a story based on one woman’s
unsubstantiated allegation, which quickly fell apart.

But that story was so politically correct – three young white
men allegedly rape a poor, young black woman in the South – the
maniacal liberal media would not let it go. It fit all their
stereotypes and their political agenda.

The gay and eco-friendly Frank Lombard who adopts black boys and
then allegedly sodomizes one of them on Web-cam does not fit the
liberal media’s stereotypes or their agenda.

Let’s look at the numbers. In the 15 days following Lombard’s
arrest, a search of the Nexis news service database (search term
“Frank Lombard” and “Duke University”) shows that 19 news
stories were published. Most of that coverage was in small,
local newspapers and was cursory.

In the 15 days that followed the arrest of two Duke lacrosse
players, on April 18, 2006, there were 1,056 news stories.
(Nexis search for “Duke University” and “lacrosse” and “rape.”)
(The third lacrosse player was not arrested until May 15.)

And in the few weeks prior to those arrests, following the
woman’s Mar. 14, 2006, claim that she was raped, there were an
additional 1,367 stories. All of that included extensive
coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News Channel,
National Public Radio, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, and all the
major newspapers and magazines. The coverage was wall-to-wall.

Yet a fairly prominent gay Duke University official is nabbed in
an FBI child-sex sting and there are 19 news stories. Two Duke
lacrosse players get arrested for supposedly raping a stripper
and there are more than 2,400 stories. There’s something wrong
with this picture.

Does anyone doubt that if a prominent straight man at Duke
University had adopted a young black girl and then sexually
abused her and broadcast the abuse over the Internet, it would
not be big news?

The coverage would again be wall-to-wall.

But here’s the reality. The liberal media support homosexuality.
Stories that in any way undermine the media’s rosy picture of
homosexuality are usually not given wide coverage.

Lombard lives in a sexually progressive commune with his gay
partner. A story that undermines the liberal image of the
committed gay couple – in this case, two highly educated Duke
university employees – living comfortably in suburbia is not to
be promoted.

Lombard adopted two black boys. A story that in any way taints
the liberal picture of gay adoption is not to be promoted, and
especially not promoted if the story has a race component (white
male father, black sons).

Lombard allegedly drugged one of his sons and then sexually
abused him on more than one occasion, and allegedly allowed
others to abuse the boy. A gay man drugging and sodomizing his
own son does not help advance the gay agenda, so it gets little
coverage.

At the same time, the story is so morally revolting it can only
taint anyone or anything associated with it – that includes Duke
University, Eno Commons, the city of Durham, the gay community
in general and the liberal media who rabidly covered the Duke
lacrosse scandal story.

Bottom line for liberal media: White males allegedly rape black
woman in the South equals politically correct story, lots of
coverage. Gay man adopts and then allegedly sodomizes his black
son equals politically incorrect story, very little coverage.

The good news in all this? The two children adopted by Lombard
are now with the North Carolina Department of Social Services.
Hopefully, they will get the counseling they need and, God
willing, a real mother and father to adopt them.

http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2009-0815-
laughable_double_standard.htm

--
For all you assbags who thought voting for that racist jackoff
Obama twice was such a great idea, this perverts' crimes are
your legacy.

Remind the racists at the DOJ about this homosexual white on
black baby crime the American liberal biased media is attempting
to obfuscate.

Email the Eric Holder ("report Zimmerman for racism" DOJ email
address) racist club at: ***@usdoj.gov.

[Norman Finkelstein]

In article <lft4ct$vq7$***@news.mixmin.net>
Gronk <***@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
 
A Laughable Double Standard
The Duke University-Rape Case Nobody Knows About

Oliver Sykes
GUEST COLUMNIST

When the Duke University-lacrosse-rape story broke in the spring
of 2006, it sparked massive media coverage nationwide for more
than two years and endless liberal posturing about white
privilege vs. a disadvantaged black woman – three Duke lacrosse
players were charged with raping and kidnapping a black
stripper. It all turned out to be a lie, as we now know, and the
politically correct house of cards collapsed. The liberal media
quickly moved on with few regrets about a rush to judgment.

Now there is another Duke University-rape story with a strong
evidence trail of e-mails, photos, and videos, as well as
investigative work by the FBI, an Internet Crimes Against
Children task force, the State Bureau of Investigation, and
police forces in Washington, D.C. and in Durham, N.C. But this
time, the liberal media aren’t saying much.

That’s because this case involves a homosexual Duke University
official who does AIDS research; who lives with his partner in a
sexually liberated and eco-friendly housing community; who
adopted two black boys; who allegedly drugged and sodomized one
of the boys; who allegedly broadcast the sodomy online; and who
reportedly offered the 5-year-old boy up to other gay abusers on
the Internet.

This is not a politically correct storyline: ‘Gay White Duke
Official Rapes Adopted Black Boy.’ It doesn’t fit the liberal
worldview. ‘Angry White Male Rapes Black Girl’ does – but that’s
not the story here. Thus the meager media coverage. Let’s look
at what’s known so far.

Frank Lombard, 42, is the associate director of the Center for
Health Policy at Duke University where he does a lot of patients-
with-HIV/AIDS research and brings in grant money: for example,
$4 million in 2007. He also teaches undergraduate courses, as
listed for 2009, including “Introduction to the United States
Health Care System” and “Health Policy Analysis.”

Lombard lives at the Eno Commons with his partner Ken Shipp, a
pharmacist who also works at Duke doing HIV/AIDS research. Eno
Commons is a cohousing neighborhood in Durham, which was
developed by lesbian activist Sherri Zann Rosenthal, also the
assistant city attorney for Durham.

Enos Commons describes itself as “embracing diversity” and
welcoming to “residents of all ages, races, religious beliefs,
and affectional preferences.” It says it is open to lesbian,
gay, bisexual and/or transgender members and has no restrictions
on romantic relations between consenting adults. It also
describes itself as a “Paradise for Children” who “learn what
they live.”

The FBI, the police, and U.S. attorneys first learned about
Lombard through a “confidential source,” as explained in a sworn
statement by Detective Timothy Palchak, who works for the D.C.
Metropolitan Police Department, assigned to the Northern
Virginia Regional Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force.

The confidential source, or “CS,” was facing child pornography
charges and decided to cooperate with investigators about other
people involved “in the sexual abuse and molestation of
children.”

CS stated that he used the Internet-based video chat program
ICUii (I See You Too) to talk with a person with the user name
“cooper2” and “cooperse.” According to Palchak’s statement, the
following was determined:

- Officials with ICUii, under subpoena, “provided information
that the ICUii account of ‘cooper2’ belongs to Frank Lombard.”
ICUii “listed Frank Lombard’s email address” and his telephone
number, and also indicated “that Frank Lombard’s profile
description stated he was interested in ‘perv fam fun,’ a
reference to incestuous child molestation.”

- ICUii also disclosed to the FBI that a customer had
complained back in January 2007 that, in chatting with Lombard
on ICUii, “Lombard told the complainant that he ‘was into
incest’ and that he had adopted two African-American children.”

- “The complainant also explained that Frank Lombard described
himself, in his profile, as being a ‘perv dad for fun.’”

- CS said he met cooper2 about four years ago through ICUii
and they corresponded every few weeks, and CS had seen cooper2
“over webcam as many as one hundred times.”

- CS witnessed cooper2 “perform oral sex on an African-American
child who appeared to be under the age of ten, and [too graphic
to print], all of which activity was displayed to CS using the
individual’s webcam.”

- Cooper 2 also, according to CS, advised “that he lived in the
Raleigh/Durham area of North Carolina; that the child was an
adopted child, one of two adopted African-American children;
that he had a live-in gay male partner who did not participate
in the sexual abuse; and that he had allowed other individuals
to sexually molest the child.”

As the statement continues, Palchak says that he engaged in an
undercover operation using the online chat program Yahoo!
Instant Messenger and chatted with a person using the “display
name ‘F L.’” Sections of Palchak’s statement read:

- FL used the “photo share” feature of Yahoo! Instant Messenger
and sent to the detective “nude photos of himself, which
pictures match the North Carolina driver’s license photograph of
Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

- “User with the display name ‘F L’ stated that he had sexually
molested his adopted, male, African-American child who he had
adopted as an infant and is currently five-years old.”

- “He advised Your affiant [Palchak] in particular that the
child had performed oral sex on him, he had ‘fingered’ the
child, and that he had [too graphic to print].

- “He also advised … that he has met other pedophiles on the
program ICUii at times when he was willing to display his
adopted child on that program.”

- “He further stated that the abuse of the child was easier
when the child was too young to talk or know what was happening,
but that he had drugged the child with Benadryl during the
molestation.”

- “ ‘F L’ invited your affiant to fly to Durham this week in
order to have sexual contact with his 5-year-old adopted child.
‘F L’ stated to Your affiant that there would be no limits on
the sexual activity he could engage in with his 5-year-old
adopted child.”

- “During this conversation, ‘F L’ was fully visible over the
webcam, including his face. ‘F L’ is identical to the North
Carolina driver’s license photograph of Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

Lombard was arrested on June 24. He is charged with offering up
his 5-year-old adopted son for sex to other people (U.S. Code
Section 2422(a). The maximum penalty for such a crime is 20
years imprisonment.

One would think that the arrest of a prominent Duke University
official for such a heinous crime would spark a lot of major
media coverage. After all, this is the same Duke University that
the media (and Duke’s liberal faculty members) went batty over
with the lacrosse-rape story – a story based on one woman’s
unsubstantiated allegation, which quickly fell apart.

But that story was so politically correct – three young white
men allegedly rape a poor, young black woman in the South – the
maniacal liberal media would not let it go. It fit all their
stereotypes and their political agenda.

The gay and eco-friendly Frank Lombard who adopts black boys and
then allegedly sodomizes one of them on Web-cam does not fit the
liberal media’s stereotypes or their agenda.

Let’s look at the numbers. In the 15 days following Lombard’s
arrest, a search of the Nexis news service database (search term
“Frank Lombard” and “Duke University”) shows that 19 news
stories were published. Most of that coverage was in small,
local newspapers and was cursory.

In the 15 days that followed the arrest of two Duke lacrosse
players, on April 18, 2006, there were 1,056 news stories.
(Nexis search for “Duke University” and “lacrosse” and “rape.”)
(The third lacrosse player was not arrested until May 15.)

And in the few weeks prior to those arrests, following the
woman’s Mar. 14, 2006, claim that she was raped, there were an
additional 1,367 stories. All of that included extensive
coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News Channel,
National Public Radio, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, and all the
major newspapers and magazines. The coverage was wall-to-wall.

Yet a fairly prominent gay Duke University official is nabbed in
an FBI child-sex sting and there are 19 news stories. Two Duke
lacrosse players get arrested for supposedly raping a stripper
and there are more than 2,400 stories. There’s something wrong
with this picture.

Does anyone doubt that if a prominent straight man at Duke
University had adopted a young black girl and then sexually
abused her and broadcast the abuse over the Internet, it would
not be big news?

The coverage would again be wall-to-wall.

But here’s the reality. The liberal media support homosexuality.
Stories that in any way undermine the media’s rosy picture of
homosexuality are usually not given wide coverage.

Lombard lives in a sexually progressive commune with his gay
partner. A story that undermines the liberal image of the
committed gay couple – in this case, two highly educated Duke
university employees – living comfortably in suburbia is not to
be promoted.

Lombard adopted two black boys. A story that in any way taints
the liberal picture of gay adoption is not to be promoted, and
especially not promoted if the story has a race component (white
male father, black sons).

Lombard allegedly drugged one of his sons and then sexually
abused him on more than one occasion, and allegedly allowed
others to abuse the boy. A gay man drugging and sodomizing his
own son does not help advance the gay agenda, so it gets little
coverage.

At the same time, the story is so morally revolting it can only
taint anyone or anything associated with it – that includes Duke
University, Eno Commons, the city of Durham, the gay community
in general and the liberal media who rabidly covered the Duke
lacrosse scandal story.

Bottom line for liberal media: White males allegedly rape black
woman in the South equals politically correct story, lots of
coverage. Gay man adopts and then allegedly sodomizes his black
son equals politically incorrect story, very little coverage.

The good news in all this? The two children adopted by Lombard
are now with the North Carolina Department of Social Services.
Hopefully, they will get the counseling they need and, God
willing, a real mother and father to adopt them.

http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2009-0815-
laughable_double_standard.htm

--
For all you assbags who thought voting for that racist jackoff
Obama twice was such a great idea, this perverts' crimes are
your legacy.

Remind the racists at the DOJ about this homosexual white on
black baby crime the American liberal biased media is attempting
to obfuscate.

Email the Eric Holder ("report Zimmerman for racism" DOJ email
address) racist club at: ***@usdoj.gov.

[Norman Finkelstein]

In article <lfspku$963$***@news.mixmin.net>
Gronk <***@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
 
A Laughable Double Standard
The Duke University-Rape Case Nobody Knows About

Oliver Sykes
GUEST COLUMNIST

When the Duke University-lacrosse-rape story broke in the spring
of 2006, it sparked massive media coverage nationwide for more
than two years and endless liberal posturing about white
privilege vs. a disadvantaged black woman – three Duke lacrosse
players were charged with raping and kidnapping a black
stripper. It all turned out to be a lie, as we now know, and the
politically correct house of cards collapsed. The liberal media
quickly moved on with few regrets about a rush to judgment.

Now there is another Duke University-rape story with a strong
evidence trail of e-mails, photos, and videos, as well as
investigative work by the FBI, an Internet Crimes Against
Children task force, the State Bureau of Investigation, and
police forces in Washington, D.C. and in Durham, N.C. But this
time, the liberal media aren’t saying much.

That’s because this case involves a homosexual Duke University
official who does AIDS research; who lives with his partner in a
sexually liberated and eco-friendly housing community; who
adopted two black boys; who allegedly drugged and sodomized one
of the boys; who allegedly broadcast the sodomy online; and who
reportedly offered the 5-year-old boy up to other gay abusers on
the Internet.

This is not a politically correct storyline: ‘Gay White Duke
Official Rapes Adopted Black Boy.’ It doesn’t fit the liberal
worldview. ‘Angry White Male Rapes Black Girl’ does – but that’s
not the story here. Thus the meager media coverage. Let’s look
at what’s known so far.

Frank Lombard, 42, is the associate director of the Center for
Health Policy at Duke University where he does a lot of patients-
with-HIV/AIDS research and brings in grant money: for example,
$4 million in 2007. He also teaches undergraduate courses, as
listed for 2009, including “Introduction to the United States
Health Care System” and “Health Policy Analysis.”

Lombard lives at the Eno Commons with his partner Ken Shipp, a
pharmacist who also works at Duke doing HIV/AIDS research. Eno
Commons is a cohousing neighborhood in Durham, which was
developed by lesbian activist Sherri Zann Rosenthal, also the
assistant city attorney for Durham.

Enos Commons describes itself as “embracing diversity” and
welcoming to “residents of all ages, races, religious beliefs,
and affectional preferences.” It says it is open to lesbian,
gay, bisexual and/or transgender members and has no restrictions
on romantic relations between consenting adults. It also
describes itself as a “Paradise for Children” who “learn what
they live.”

The FBI, the police, and U.S. attorneys first learned about
Lombard through a “confidential source,” as explained in a sworn
statement by Detective Timothy Palchak, who works for the D.C.
Metropolitan Police Department, assigned to the Northern
Virginia Regional Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force.

The confidential source, or “CS,” was facing child pornography
charges and decided to cooperate with investigators about other
people involved “in the sexual abuse and molestation of
children.”

CS stated that he used the Internet-based video chat program
ICUii (I See You Too) to talk with a person with the user name
“cooper2” and “cooperse.” According to Palchak’s statement, the
following was determined:

- Officials with ICUii, under subpoena, “provided information
that the ICUii account of ‘cooper2’ belongs to Frank Lombard.”
ICUii “listed Frank Lombard’s email address” and his telephone
number, and also indicated “that Frank Lombard’s profile
description stated he was interested in ‘perv fam fun,’ a
reference to incestuous child molestation.”

- ICUii also disclosed to the FBI that a customer had
complained back in January 2007 that, in chatting with Lombard
on ICUii, “Lombard told the complainant that he ‘was into
incest’ and that he had adopted two African-American children.”

- “The complainant also explained that Frank Lombard described
himself, in his profile, as being a ‘perv dad for fun.’”

- CS said he met cooper2 about four years ago through ICUii
and they corresponded every few weeks, and CS had seen cooper2
“over webcam as many as one hundred times.”

- CS witnessed cooper2 “perform oral sex on an African-American
child who appeared to be under the age of ten, and [too graphic
to print], all of which activity was displayed to CS using the
individual’s webcam.”

- Cooper 2 also, according to CS, advised “that he lived in the
Raleigh/Durham area of North Carolina; that the child was an
adopted child, one of two adopted African-American children;
that he had a live-in gay male partner who did not participate
in the sexual abuse; and that he had allowed other individuals
to sexually molest the child.”

As the statement continues, Palchak says that he engaged in an
undercover operation using the online chat program Yahoo!
Instant Messenger and chatted with a person using the “display
name ‘F L.’” Sections of Palchak’s statement read:

- FL used the “photo share” feature of Yahoo! Instant Messenger
and sent to the detective “nude photos of himself, which
pictures match the North Carolina driver’s license photograph of
Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

- “User with the display name ‘F L’ stated that he had sexually
molested his adopted, male, African-American child who he had
adopted as an infant and is currently five-years old.”

- “He advised Your affiant [Palchak] in particular that the
child had performed oral sex on him, he had ‘fingered’ the
child, and that he had [too graphic to print].

- “He also advised … that he has met other pedophiles on the
program ICUii at times when he was willing to display his
adopted child on that program.”

- “He further stated that the abuse of the child was easier
when the child was too young to talk or know what was happening,
but that he had drugged the child with Benadryl during the
molestation.”

- “ ‘F L’ invited your affiant to fly to Durham this week in
order to have sexual contact with his 5-year-old adopted child.
‘F L’ stated to Your affiant that there would be no limits on
the sexual activity he could engage in with his 5-year-old
adopted child.”

- “During this conversation, ‘F L’ was fully visible over the
webcam, including his face. ‘F L’ is identical to the North
Carolina driver’s license photograph of Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

Lombard was arrested on June 24. He is charged with offering up
his 5-year-old adopted son for sex to other people (U.S. Code
Section 2422(a). The maximum penalty for such a crime is 20
years imprisonment.

One would think that the arrest of a prominent Duke University
official for such a heinous crime would spark a lot of major
media coverage. After all, this is the same Duke University that
the media (and Duke’s liberal faculty members) went batty over
with the lacrosse-rape story – a story based on one woman’s
unsubstantiated allegation, which quickly fell apart.

But that story was so politically correct – three young white
men allegedly rape a poor, young black woman in the South – the
maniacal liberal media would not let it go. It fit all their
stereotypes and their political agenda.

The gay and eco-friendly Frank Lombard who adopts black boys and
then allegedly sodomizes one of them on Web-cam does not fit the
liberal media’s stereotypes or their agenda.

Let’s look at the numbers. In the 15 days following Lombard’s
arrest, a search of the Nexis news service database (search term
“Frank Lombard” and “Duke University”) shows that 19 news
stories were published. Most of that coverage was in small,
local newspapers and was cursory.

In the 15 days that followed the arrest of two Duke lacrosse
players, on April 18, 2006, there were 1,056 news stories.
(Nexis search for “Duke University” and “lacrosse” and “rape.”)
(The third lacrosse player was not arrested until May 15.)

And in the few weeks prior to those arrests, following the
woman’s Mar. 14, 2006, claim that she was raped, there were an
additional 1,367 stories. All of that included extensive
coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News Channel,
National Public Radio, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, and all the
major newspapers and magazines. The coverage was wall-to-wall.

Yet a fairly prominent gay Duke University official is nabbed in
an FBI child-sex sting and there are 19 news stories. Two Duke
lacrosse players get arrested for supposedly raping a stripper
and there are more than 2,400 stories. There’s something wrong
with this picture.

Does anyone doubt that if a prominent straight man at Duke
University had adopted a young black girl and then sexually
abused her and broadcast the abuse over the Internet, it would
not be big news?

The coverage would again be wall-to-wall.

But here’s the reality. The liberal media support homosexuality.
Stories that in any way undermine the media’s rosy picture of
homosexuality are usually not given wide coverage.

Lombard lives in a sexually progressive commune with his gay
partner. A story that undermines the liberal image of the
committed gay couple – in this case, two highly educated Duke
university employees – living comfortably in suburbia is not to
be promoted.

Lombard adopted two black boys. A story that in any way taints
the liberal picture of gay adoption is not to be promoted, and
especially not promoted if the story has a race component (white
male father, black sons).

Lombard allegedly drugged one of his sons and then sexually
abused him on more than one occasion, and allegedly allowed
others to abuse the boy. A gay man drugging and sodomizing his
own son does not help advance the gay agenda, so it gets little
coverage.

At the same time, the story is so morally revolting it can only
taint anyone or anything associated with it – that includes Duke
University, Eno Commons, the city of Durham, the gay community
in general and the liberal media who rabidly covered the Duke
lacrosse scandal story.

Bottom line for liberal media: White males allegedly rape black
woman in the South equals politically correct story, lots of
coverage. Gay man adopts and then allegedly sodomizes his black
son equals politically incorrect story, very little coverage.

The good news in all this? The two children adopted by Lombard
are now with the North Carolina Department of Social Services.
Hopefully, they will get the counseling they need and, God
willing, a real mother and father to adopt them.

http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2009-0815-
laughable_double_standard.htm

--
For all you assbags who thought voting for that racist jackoff
Obama twice was such a great idea, this perverts' crimes are
your legacy.

Remind the racists at the DOJ about this homosexual white on
black baby crime the American liberal biased media is attempting
to obfuscate.

Email the Eric Holder ("report Zimmerman for racism" DOJ email
address) racist club at: ***@usdoj.gov.

[Norman Finkelstein]

In article <lfspeg$8on$***@news.mixmin.net>
Gronk <***@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
 
A Laughable Double Standard
The Duke University-Rape Case Nobody Knows About

Oliver Sykes
GUEST COLUMNIST

When the Duke University-lacrosse-rape story broke in the spring
of 2006, it sparked massive media coverage nationwide for more
than two years and endless liberal posturing about white
privilege vs. a disadvantaged black woman – three Duke lacrosse
players were charged with raping and kidnapping a black
stripper. It all turned out to be a lie, as we now know, and the
politically correct house of cards collapsed. The liberal media
quickly moved on with few regrets about a rush to judgment.

Now there is another Duke University-rape story with a strong
evidence trail of e-mails, photos, and videos, as well as
investigative work by the FBI, an Internet Crimes Against
Children task force, the State Bureau of Investigation, and
police forces in Washington, D.C. and in Durham, N.C. But this
time, the liberal media aren’t saying much.

That’s because this case involves a homosexual Duke University
official who does AIDS research; who lives with his partner in a
sexually liberated and eco-friendly housing community; who
adopted two black boys; who allegedly drugged and sodomized one
of the boys; who allegedly broadcast the sodomy online; and who
reportedly offered the 5-year-old boy up to other gay abusers on
the Internet.

This is not a politically correct storyline: ‘Gay White Duke
Official Rapes Adopted Black Boy.’ It doesn’t fit the liberal
worldview. ‘Angry White Male Rapes Black Girl’ does – but that’s
not the story here. Thus the meager media coverage. Let’s look
at what’s known so far.

Frank Lombard, 42, is the associate director of the Center for
Health Policy at Duke University where he does a lot of patients-
with-HIV/AIDS research and brings in grant money: for example,
$4 million in 2007. He also teaches undergraduate courses, as
listed for 2009, including “Introduction to the United States
Health Care System” and “Health Policy Analysis.”

Lombard lives at the Eno Commons with his partner Ken Shipp, a
pharmacist who also works at Duke doing HIV/AIDS research. Eno
Commons is a cohousing neighborhood in Durham, which was
developed by lesbian activist Sherri Zann Rosenthal, also the
assistant city attorney for Durham.

Enos Commons describes itself as “embracing diversity” and
welcoming to “residents of all ages, races, religious beliefs,
and affectional preferences.” It says it is open to lesbian,
gay, bisexual and/or transgender members and has no restrictions
on romantic relations between consenting adults. It also
describes itself as a “Paradise for Children” who “learn what
they live.”

The FBI, the police, and U.S. attorneys first learned about
Lombard through a “confidential source,” as explained in a sworn
statement by Detective Timothy Palchak, who works for the D.C.
Metropolitan Police Department, assigned to the Northern
Virginia Regional Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force.

The confidential source, or “CS,” was facing child pornography
charges and decided to cooperate with investigators about other
people involved “in the sexual abuse and molestation of
children.”

CS stated that he used the Internet-based video chat program
ICUii (I See You Too) to talk with a person with the user name
“cooper2” and “cooperse.” According to Palchak’s statement, the
following was determined:

- Officials with ICUii, under subpoena, “provided information
that the ICUii account of ‘cooper2’ belongs to Frank Lombard.”
ICUii “listed Frank Lombard’s email address” and his telephone
number, and also indicated “that Frank Lombard’s profile
description stated he was interested in ‘perv fam fun,’ a
reference to incestuous child molestation.”

- ICUii also disclosed to the FBI that a customer had
complained back in January 2007 that, in chatting with Lombard
on ICUii, “Lombard told the complainant that he ‘was into
incest’ and that he had adopted two African-American children.”

- “The complainant also explained that Frank Lombard described
himself, in his profile, as being a ‘perv dad for fun.’”

- CS said he met cooper2 about four years ago through ICUii
and they corresponded every few weeks, and CS had seen cooper2
“over webcam as many as one hundred times.”

- CS witnessed cooper2 “perform oral sex on an African-American
child who appeared to be under the age of ten, and [too graphic
to print], all of which activity was displayed to CS using the
individual’s webcam.”

- Cooper 2 also, according to CS, advised “that he lived in the
Raleigh/Durham area of North Carolina; that the child was an
adopted child, one of two adopted African-American children;
that he had a live-in gay male partner who did not participate
in the sexual abuse; and that he had allowed other individuals
to sexually molest the child.”

As the statement continues, Palchak says that he engaged in an
undercover operation using the online chat program Yahoo!
Instant Messenger and chatted with a person using the “display
name ‘F L.’” Sections of Palchak’s statement read:

- FL used the “photo share” feature of Yahoo! Instant Messenger
and sent to the detective “nude photos of himself, which
pictures match the North Carolina driver’s license photograph of
Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

- “User with the display name ‘F L’ stated that he had sexually
molested his adopted, male, African-American child who he had
adopted as an infant and is currently five-years old.”

- “He advised Your affiant [Palchak] in particular that the
child had performed oral sex on him, he had ‘fingered’ the
child, and that he had [too graphic to print].

- “He also advised … that he has met other pedophiles on the
program ICUii at times when he was willing to display his
adopted child on that program.”

- “He further stated that the abuse of the child was easier
when the child was too young to talk or know what was happening,
but that he had drugged the child with Benadryl during the
molestation.”

- “ ‘F L’ invited your affiant to fly to Durham this week in
order to have sexual contact with his 5-year-old adopted child.
‘F L’ stated to Your affiant that there would be no limits on
the sexual activity he could engage in with his 5-year-old
adopted child.”

- “During this conversation, ‘F L’ was fully visible over the
webcam, including his face. ‘F L’ is identical to the North
Carolina driver’s license photograph of Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

Lombard was arrested on June 24. He is charged with offering up
his 5-year-old adopted son for sex to other people (U.S. Code
Section 2422(a). The maximum penalty for such a crime is 20
years imprisonment.

One would think that the arrest of a prominent Duke University
official for such a heinous crime would spark a lot of major
media coverage. After all, this is the same Duke University that
the media (and Duke’s liberal faculty members) went batty over
with the lacrosse-rape story – a story based on one woman’s
unsubstantiated allegation, which quickly fell apart.

But that story was so politically correct – three young white
men allegedly rape a poor, young black woman in the South – the
maniacal liberal media would not let it go. It fit all their
stereotypes and their political agenda.

The gay and eco-friendly Frank Lombard who adopts black boys and
then allegedly sodomizes one of them on Web-cam does not fit the
liberal media’s stereotypes or their agenda.

Let’s look at the numbers. In the 15 days following Lombard’s
arrest, a search of the Nexis news service database (search term
“Frank Lombard” and “Duke University”) shows that 19 news
stories were published. Most of that coverage was in small,
local newspapers and was cursory.

In the 15 days that followed the arrest of two Duke lacrosse
players, on April 18, 2006, there were 1,056 news stories.
(Nexis search for “Duke University” and “lacrosse” and “rape.”)
(The third lacrosse player was not arrested until May 15.)

And in the few weeks prior to those arrests, following the
woman’s Mar. 14, 2006, claim that she was raped, there were an
additional 1,367 stories. All of that included extensive
coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News Channel,
National Public Radio, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, and all the
major newspapers and magazines. The coverage was wall-to-wall.

Yet a fairly prominent gay Duke University official is nabbed in
an FBI child-sex sting and there are 19 news stories. Two Duke
lacrosse players get arrested for supposedly raping a stripper
and there are more than 2,400 stories. There’s something wrong
with this picture.

Does anyone doubt that if a prominent straight man at Duke
University had adopted a young black girl and then sexually
abused her and broadcast the abuse over the Internet, it would
not be big news?

The coverage would again be wall-to-wall.

But here’s the reality. The liberal media support homosexuality.
Stories that in any way undermine the media’s rosy picture of
homosexuality are usually not given wide coverage.

Lombard lives in a sexually progressive commune with his gay
partner. A story that undermines the liberal image of the
committed gay couple – in this case, two highly educated Duke
university employees – living comfortably in suburbia is not to
be promoted.

Lombard adopted two black boys. A story that in any way taints
the liberal picture of gay adoption is not to be promoted, and
especially not promoted if the story has a race component (white
male father, black sons).

Lombard allegedly drugged one of his sons and then sexually
abused him on more than one occasion, and allegedly allowed
others to abuse the boy. A gay man drugging and sodomizing his
own son does not help advance the gay agenda, so it gets little
coverage.

At the same time, the story is so morally revolting it can only
taint anyone or anything associated with it – that includes Duke
University, Eno Commons, the city of Durham, the gay community
in general and the liberal media who rabidly covered the Duke
lacrosse scandal story.

Bottom line for liberal media: White males allegedly rape black
woman in the South equals politically correct story, lots of
coverage. Gay man adopts and then allegedly sodomizes his black
son equals politically incorrect story, very little coverage.

The good news in all this? The two children adopted by Lombard
are now with the North Carolina Department of Social Services.
Hopefully, they will get the counseling they need and, God
willing, a real mother and father to adopt them.

http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2009-0815-
laughable_double_standard.htm

--
For all you assbags who thought voting for that racist jackoff
Obama twice was such a great idea, this perverts' crimes are
your legacy.

Remind the racists at the DOJ about this homosexual white on
black baby crime the American liberal biased media is attempting
to obfuscate.

Email the Eric Holder ("report Zimmerman for racism" DOJ email
address) racist club at: ***@usdoj.gov.

[Norman Finkelstein]

In article <lfte2q$p61$***@dont-email.me>
"David 1950" <***@eternalsep.net> wrote:
 
A Laughable Double Standard
The Duke University-Rape Case Nobody Knows About

Oliver Sykes
GUEST COLUMNIST

When the Duke University-lacrosse-rape story broke in the spring
of 2006, it sparked massive media coverage nationwide for more
than two years and endless liberal posturing about white
privilege vs. a disadvantaged black woman – three Duke lacrosse
players were charged with raping and kidnapping a black
stripper. It all turned out to be a lie, as we now know, and the
politically correct house of cards collapsed. The liberal media
quickly moved on with few regrets about a rush to judgment.

Now there is another Duke University-rape story with a strong
evidence trail of e-mails, photos, and videos, as well as
investigative work by the FBI, an Internet Crimes Against
Children task force, the State Bureau of Investigation, and
police forces in Washington, D.C. and in Durham, N.C. But this
time, the liberal media aren’t saying much.

That’s because this case involves a homosexual Duke University
official who does AIDS research; who lives with his partner in a
sexually liberated and eco-friendly housing community; who
adopted two black boys; who allegedly drugged and sodomized one
of the boys; who allegedly broadcast the sodomy online; and who
reportedly offered the 5-year-old boy up to other gay abusers on
the Internet.

This is not a politically correct storyline: ‘Gay White Duke
Official Rapes Adopted Black Boy.’ It doesn’t fit the liberal
worldview. ‘Angry White Male Rapes Black Girl’ does – but that’s
not the story here. Thus the meager media coverage. Let’s look
at what’s known so far.

Frank Lombard, 42, is the associate director of the Center for
Health Policy at Duke University where he does a lot of patients-
with-HIV/AIDS research and brings in grant money: for example,
$4 million in 2007. He also teaches undergraduate courses, as
listed for 2009, including “Introduction to the United States
Health Care System” and “Health Policy Analysis.”

Lombard lives at the Eno Commons with his partner Ken Shipp, a
pharmacist who also works at Duke doing HIV/AIDS research. Eno
Commons is a cohousing neighborhood in Durham, which was
developed by lesbian activist Sherri Zann Rosenthal, also the
assistant city attorney for Durham.

Enos Commons describes itself as “embracing diversity” and
welcoming to “residents of all ages, races, religious beliefs,
and affectional preferences.” It says it is open to lesbian,
gay, bisexual and/or transgender members and has no restrictions
on romantic relations between consenting adults. It also
describes itself as a “Paradise for Children” who “learn what
they live.”

The FBI, the police, and U.S. attorneys first learned about
Lombard through a “confidential source,” as explained in a sworn
statement by Detective Timothy Palchak, who works for the D.C.
Metropolitan Police Department, assigned to the Northern
Virginia Regional Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force.

The confidential source, or “CS,” was facing child pornography
charges and decided to cooperate with investigators about other
people involved “in the sexual abuse and molestation of
children.”

CS stated that he used the Internet-based video chat program
ICUii (I See You Too) to talk with a person with the user name
“cooper2” and “cooperse.” According to Palchak’s statement, the
following was determined:

- Officials with ICUii, under subpoena, “provided information
that the ICUii account of ‘cooper2’ belongs to Frank Lombard.”
ICUii “listed Frank Lombard’s email address” and his telephone
number, and also indicated “that Frank Lombard’s profile
description stated he was interested in ‘perv fam fun,’ a
reference to incestuous child molestation.”

- ICUii also disclosed to the FBI that a customer had
complained back in January 2007 that, in chatting with Lombard
on ICUii, “Lombard told the complainant that he ‘was into
incest’ and that he had adopted two African-American children.”

- “The complainant also explained that Frank Lombard described
himself, in his profile, as being a ‘perv dad for fun.’”

- CS said he met cooper2 about four years ago through ICUii
and they corresponded every few weeks, and CS had seen cooper2
“over webcam as many as one hundred times.”

- CS witnessed cooper2 “perform oral sex on an African-American
child who appeared to be under the age of ten, and [too graphic
to print], all of which activity was displayed to CS using the
individual’s webcam.”

- Cooper 2 also, according to CS, advised “that he lived in the
Raleigh/Durham area of North Carolina; that the child was an
adopted child, one of two adopted African-American children;
that he had a live-in gay male partner who did not participate
in the sexual abuse; and that he had allowed other individuals
to sexually molest the child.”

As the statement continues, Palchak says that he engaged in an
undercover operation using the online chat program Yahoo!
Instant Messenger and chatted with a person using the “display
name ‘F L.’” Sections of Palchak’s statement read:

- FL used the “photo share” feature of Yahoo! Instant Messenger
and sent to the detective “nude photos of himself, which
pictures match the North Carolina driver’s license photograph of
Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

- “User with the display name ‘F L’ stated that he had sexually
molested his adopted, male, African-American child who he had
adopted as an infant and is currently five-years old.”

- “He advised Your affiant [Palchak] in particular that the
child had performed oral sex on him, he had ‘fingered’ the
child, and that he had [too graphic to print].

- “He also advised … that he has met other pedophiles on the
program ICUii at times when he was willing to display his
adopted child on that program.”

- “He further stated that the abuse of the child was easier
when the child was too young to talk or know what was happening,
but that he had drugged the child with Benadryl during the
molestation.”

- “ ‘F L’ invited your affiant to fly to Durham this week in
order to have sexual contact with his 5-year-old adopted child.
‘F L’ stated to Your affiant that there would be no limits on
the sexual activity he could engage in with his 5-year-old
adopted child.”

- “During this conversation, ‘F L’ was fully visible over the
webcam, including his face. ‘F L’ is identical to the North
Carolina driver’s license photograph of Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

Lombard was arrested on June 24. He is charged with offering up
his 5-year-old adopted son for sex to other people (U.S. Code
Section 2422(a). The maximum penalty for such a crime is 20
years imprisonment.

One would think that the arrest of a prominent Duke University
official for such a heinous crime would spark a lot of major
media coverage. After all, this is the same Duke University that
the media (and Duke’s liberal faculty members) went batty over
with the lacrosse-rape story – a story based on one woman’s
unsubstantiated allegation, which quickly fell apart.

But that story was so politically correct – three young white
men allegedly rape a poor, young black woman in the South – the
maniacal liberal media would not let it go. It fit all their
stereotypes and their political agenda.

The gay and eco-friendly Frank Lombard who adopts black boys and
then allegedly sodomizes one of them on Web-cam does not fit the
liberal media’s stereotypes or their agenda.

Let’s look at the numbers. In the 15 days following Lombard’s
arrest, a search of the Nexis news service database (search term
“Frank Lombard” and “Duke University”) shows that 19 news
stories were published. Most of that coverage was in small,
local newspapers and was cursory.

In the 15 days that followed the arrest of two Duke lacrosse
players, on April 18, 2006, there were 1,056 news stories.
(Nexis search for “Duke University” and “lacrosse” and “rape.”)
(The third lacrosse player was not arrested until May 15.)

And in the few weeks prior to those arrests, following the
woman’s Mar. 14, 2006, claim that she was raped, there were an
additional 1,367 stories. All of that included extensive
coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News Channel,
National Public Radio, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, and all the
major newspapers and magazines. The coverage was wall-to-wall.

Yet a fairly prominent gay Duke University official is nabbed in
an FBI child-sex sting and there are 19 news stories. Two Duke
lacrosse players get arrested for supposedly raping a stripper
and there are more than 2,400 stories. There’s something wrong
with this picture.

Does anyone doubt that if a prominent straight man at Duke
University had adopted a young black girl and then sexually
abused her and broadcast the abuse over the Internet, it would
not be big news?

The coverage would again be wall-to-wall.

But here’s the reality. The liberal media support homosexuality.
Stories that in any way undermine the media’s rosy picture of
homosexuality are usually not given wide coverage.

Lombard lives in a sexually progressive commune with his gay
partner. A story that undermines the liberal image of the
committed gay couple – in this case, two highly educated Duke
university employees – living comfortably in suburbia is not to
be promoted.

Lombard adopted two black boys. A story that in any way taints
the liberal picture of gay adoption is not to be promoted, and
especially not promoted if the story has a race component (white
male father, black sons).

Lombard allegedly drugged one of his sons and then sexually
abused him on more than one occasion, and allegedly allowed
others to abuse the boy. A gay man drugging and sodomizing his
own son does not help advance the gay agenda, so it gets little
coverage.

At the same time, the story is so morally revolting it can only
taint anyone or anything associated with it – that includes Duke
University, Eno Commons, the city of Durham, the gay community
in general and the liberal media who rabidly covered the Duke
lacrosse scandal story.

Bottom line for liberal media: White males allegedly rape black
woman in the South equals politically correct story, lots of
coverage. Gay man adopts and then allegedly sodomizes his black
son equals politically incorrect story, very little coverage.

The good news in all this? The two children adopted by Lombard
are now with the North Carolina Department of Social Services.
Hopefully, they will get the counseling they need and, God
willing, a real mother and father to adopt them.

http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2009-0815-
laughable_double_standard.htm

--
For all you assbags who thought voting for that racist jackoff
Obama twice was such a great idea, this perverts' crimes are
your legacy.

Remind the racists at the DOJ about this homosexual white on
black baby crime the American liberal biased media is attempting
to obfuscate.

Email the Eric Holder ("report Zimmerman for racism" DOJ email
address) racist club at: ***@usdoj.gov.

[Norman Finkelstein]

In article <lft425$umk$***@news.mixmin.net>
Gronk <***@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
 
A Laughable Double Standard
The Duke University-Rape Case Nobody Knows About

Oliver Sykes
GUEST COLUMNIST

When the Duke University-lacrosse-rape story broke in the spring
of 2006, it sparked massive media coverage nationwide for more
than two years and endless liberal posturing about white
privilege vs. a disadvantaged black woman – three Duke lacrosse
players were charged with raping and kidnapping a black
stripper. It all turned out to be a lie, as we now know, and the
politically correct house of cards collapsed. The liberal media
quickly moved on with few regrets about a rush to judgment.

Now there is another Duke University-rape story with a strong
evidence trail of e-mails, photos, and videos, as well as
investigative work by the FBI, an Internet Crimes Against
Children task force, the State Bureau of Investigation, and
police forces in Washington, D.C. and in Durham, N.C. But this
time, the liberal media aren’t saying much.

That’s because this case involves a homosexual Duke University
official who does AIDS research; who lives with his partner in a
sexually liberated and eco-friendly housing community; who
adopted two black boys; who allegedly drugged and sodomized one
of the boys; who allegedly broadcast the sodomy online; and who
reportedly offered the 5-year-old boy up to other gay abusers on
the Internet.

This is not a politically correct storyline: ‘Gay White Duke
Official Rapes Adopted Black Boy.’ It doesn’t fit the liberal
worldview. ‘Angry White Male Rapes Black Girl’ does – but that’s
not the story here. Thus the meager media coverage. Let’s look
at what’s known so far.

Frank Lombard, 42, is the associate director of the Center for
Health Policy at Duke University where he does a lot of patients-
with-HIV/AIDS research and brings in grant money: for example,
$4 million in 2007. He also teaches undergraduate courses, as
listed for 2009, including “Introduction to the United States
Health Care System” and “Health Policy Analysis.”

Lombard lives at the Eno Commons with his partner Ken Shipp, a
pharmacist who also works at Duke doing HIV/AIDS research. Eno
Commons is a cohousing neighborhood in Durham, which was
developed by lesbian activist Sherri Zann Rosenthal, also the
assistant city attorney for Durham.

Enos Commons describes itself as “embracing diversity” and
welcoming to “residents of all ages, races, religious beliefs,
and affectional preferences.” It says it is open to lesbian,
gay, bisexual and/or transgender members and has no restrictions
on romantic relations between consenting adults. It also
describes itself as a “Paradise for Children” who “learn what
they live.”

The FBI, the police, and U.S. attorneys first learned about
Lombard through a “confidential source,” as explained in a sworn
statement by Detective Timothy Palchak, who works for the D.C.
Metropolitan Police Department, assigned to the Northern
Virginia Regional Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force.

The confidential source, or “CS,” was facing child pornography
charges and decided to cooperate with investigators about other
people involved “in the sexual abuse and molestation of
children.”

CS stated that he used the Internet-based video chat program
ICUii (I See You Too) to talk with a person with the user name
“cooper2” and “cooperse.” According to Palchak’s statement, the
following was determined:

- Officials with ICUii, under subpoena, “provided information
that the ICUii account of ‘cooper2’ belongs to Frank Lombard.”
ICUii “listed Frank Lombard’s email address” and his telephone
number, and also indicated “that Frank Lombard’s profile
description stated he was interested in ‘perv fam fun,’ a
reference to incestuous child molestation.”

- ICUii also disclosed to the FBI that a customer had
complained back in January 2007 that, in chatting with Lombard
on ICUii, “Lombard told the complainant that he ‘was into
incest’ and that he had adopted two African-American children.”

- “The complainant also explained that Frank Lombard described
himself, in his profile, as being a ‘perv dad for fun.’”

- CS said he met cooper2 about four years ago through ICUii
and they corresponded every few weeks, and CS had seen cooper2
“over webcam as many as one hundred times.”

- CS witnessed cooper2 “perform oral sex on an African-American
child who appeared to be under the age of ten, and [too graphic
to print], all of which activity was displayed to CS using the
individual’s webcam.”

- Cooper 2 also, according to CS, advised “that he lived in the
Raleigh/Durham area of North Carolina; that the child was an
adopted child, one of two adopted African-American children;
that he had a live-in gay male partner who did not participate
in the sexual abuse; and that he had allowed other individuals
to sexually molest the child.”

As the statement continues, Palchak says that he engaged in an
undercover operation using the online chat program Yahoo!
Instant Messenger and chatted with a person using the “display
name ‘F L.’” Sections of Palchak’s statement read:

- FL used the “photo share” feature of Yahoo! Instant Messenger
and sent to the detective “nude photos of himself, which
pictures match the North Carolina driver’s license photograph of
Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

- “User with the display name ‘F L’ stated that he had sexually
molested his adopted, male, African-American child who he had
adopted as an infant and is currently five-years old.”

- “He advised Your affiant [Palchak] in particular that the
child had performed oral sex on him, he had ‘fingered’ the
child, and that he had [too graphic to print].

- “He also advised … that he has met other pedophiles on the
program ICUii at times when he was willing to display his
adopted child on that program.”

- “He further stated that the abuse of the child was easier
when the child was too young to talk or know what was happening,
but that he had drugged the child with Benadryl during the
molestation.”

- “ ‘F L’ invited your affiant to fly to Durham this week in
order to have sexual contact with his 5-year-old adopted child.
‘F L’ stated to Your affiant that there would be no limits on
the sexual activity he could engage in with his 5-year-old
adopted child.”

- “During this conversation, ‘F L’ was fully visible over the
webcam, including his face. ‘F L’ is identical to the North
Carolina driver’s license photograph of Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

Lombard was arrested on June 24. He is charged with offering up
his 5-year-old adopted son for sex to other people (U.S. Code
Section 2422(a). The maximum penalty for such a crime is 20
years imprisonment.

One would think that the arrest of a prominent Duke University
official for such a heinous crime would spark a lot of major
media coverage. After all, this is the same Duke University that
the media (and Duke’s liberal faculty members) went batty over
with the lacrosse-rape story – a story based on one woman’s
unsubstantiated allegation, which quickly fell apart.

But that story was so politically correct – three young white
men allegedly rape a poor, young black woman in the South – the
maniacal liberal media would not let it go. It fit all their
stereotypes and their political agenda.

The gay and eco-friendly Frank Lombard who adopts black boys and
then allegedly sodomizes one of them on Web-cam does not fit the
liberal media’s stereotypes or their agenda.

Let’s look at the numbers. In the 15 days following Lombard’s
arrest, a search of the Nexis news service database (search term
“Frank Lombard” and “Duke University”) shows that 19 news
stories were published. Most of that coverage was in small,
local newspapers and was cursory.

In the 15 days that followed the arrest of two Duke lacrosse
players, on April 18, 2006, there were 1,056 news stories.
(Nexis search for “Duke University” and “lacrosse” and “rape.”)
(The third lacrosse player was not arrested until May 15.)

And in the few weeks prior to those arrests, following the
woman’s Mar. 14, 2006, claim that she was raped, there were an
additional 1,367 stories. All of that included extensive
coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News Channel,
National Public Radio, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, and all the
major newspapers and magazines. The coverage was wall-to-wall.

Yet a fairly prominent gay Duke University official is nabbed in
an FBI child-sex sting and there are 19 news stories. Two Duke
lacrosse players get arrested for supposedly raping a stripper
and there are more than 2,400 stories. There’s something wrong
with this picture.

Does anyone doubt that if a prominent straight man at Duke
University had adopted a young black girl and then sexually
abused her and broadcast the abuse over the Internet, it would
not be big news?

The coverage would again be wall-to-wall.

But here’s the reality. The liberal media support homosexuality.
Stories that in any way undermine the media’s rosy picture of
homosexuality are usually not given wide coverage.

Lombard lives in a sexually progressive commune with his gay
partner. A story that undermines the liberal image of the
committed gay couple – in this case, two highly educated Duke
university employees – living comfortably in suburbia is not to
be promoted.

Lombard adopted two black boys. A story that in any way taints
the liberal picture of gay adoption is not to be promoted, and
especially not promoted if the story has a race component (white
male father, black sons).

Lombard allegedly drugged one of his sons and then sexually
abused him on more than one occasion, and allegedly allowed
others to abuse the boy. A gay man drugging and sodomizing his
own son does not help advance the gay agenda, so it gets little
coverage.

At the same time, the story is so morally revolting it can only
taint anyone or anything associated with it – that includes Duke
University, Eno Commons, the city of Durham, the gay community
in general and the liberal media who rabidly covered the Duke
lacrosse scandal story.

Bottom line for liberal media: White males allegedly rape black
woman in the South equals politically correct story, lots of
coverage. Gay man adopts and then allegedly sodomizes his black
son equals politically incorrect story, very little coverage.

The good news in all this? The two children adopted by Lombard
are now with the North Carolina Department of Social Services.
Hopefully, they will get the counseling they need and, God
willing, a real mother and father to adopt them.

http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2009-0815-
laughable_double_standard.htm

--
For all you assbags who thought voting for that racist jackoff
Obama twice was such a great idea, this perverts' crimes are
your legacy.

Remind the racists at the DOJ about this homosexual white on
black baby crime the American liberal biased media is attempting
to obfuscate.

Email the Eric Holder ("report Zimmerman for racism" DOJ email
address) racist club at: ***@usdoj.gov.

[Norman Finkelstein]

In article <ab497bae-d487-447a-86f8-
***@googlegroups.com>
"Tom Sr." <***@gmail.com> wrote:
 
A Laughable Double Standard
The Duke University-Rape Case Nobody Knows About

Oliver Sykes
GUEST COLUMNIST

When the Duke University-lacrosse-rape story broke in the spring
of 2006, it sparked massive media coverage nationwide for more
than two years and endless liberal posturing about white
privilege vs. a disadvantaged black woman – three Duke lacrosse
players were charged with raping and kidnapping a black
stripper. It all turned out to be a lie, as we now know, and the
politically correct house of cards collapsed. The liberal media
quickly moved on with few regrets about a rush to judgment.

Now there is another Duke University-rape story with a strong
evidence trail of e-mails, photos, and videos, as well as
investigative work by the FBI, an Internet Crimes Against
Children task force, the State Bureau of Investigation, and
police forces in Washington, D.C. and in Durham, N.C. But this
time, the liberal media aren’t saying much.

That’s because this case involves a homosexual Duke University
official who does AIDS research; who lives with his partner in a
sexually liberated and eco-friendly housing community; who
adopted two black boys; who allegedly drugged and sodomized one
of the boys; who allegedly broadcast the sodomy online; and who
reportedly offered the 5-year-old boy up to other gay abusers on
the Internet.

This is not a politically correct storyline: ‘Gay White Duke
Official Rapes Adopted Black Boy.’ It doesn’t fit the liberal
worldview. ‘Angry White Male Rapes Black Girl’ does – but that’s
not the story here. Thus the meager media coverage. Let’s look
at what’s known so far.

Frank Lombard, 42, is the associate director of the Center for
Health Policy at Duke University where he does a lot of patients-
with-HIV/AIDS research and brings in grant money: for example,
$4 million in 2007. He also teaches undergraduate courses, as
listed for 2009, including “Introduction to the United States
Health Care System” and “Health Policy Analysis.”

Lombard lives at the Eno Commons with his partner Ken Shipp, a
pharmacist who also works at Duke doing HIV/AIDS research. Eno
Commons is a cohousing neighborhood in Durham, which was
developed by lesbian activist Sherri Zann Rosenthal, also the
assistant city attorney for Durham.

Enos Commons describes itself as “embracing diversity” and
welcoming to “residents of all ages, races, religious beliefs,
and affectional preferences.” It says it is open to lesbian,
gay, bisexual and/or transgender members and has no restrictions
on romantic relations between consenting adults. It also
describes itself as a “Paradise for Children” who “learn what
they live.”

The FBI, the police, and U.S. attorneys first learned about
Lombard through a “confidential source,” as explained in a sworn
statement by Detective Timothy Palchak, who works for the D.C.
Metropolitan Police Department, assigned to the Northern
Virginia Regional Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force.

The confidential source, or “CS,” was facing child pornography
charges and decided to cooperate with investigators about other
people involved “in the sexual abuse and molestation of
children.”

CS stated that he used the Internet-based video chat program
ICUii (I See You Too) to talk with a person with the user name
“cooper2” and “cooperse.” According to Palchak’s statement, the
following was determined:

- Officials with ICUii, under subpoena, “provided information
that the ICUii account of ‘cooper2’ belongs to Frank Lombard.”
ICUii “listed Frank Lombard’s email address” and his telephone
number, and also indicated “that Frank Lombard’s profile
description stated he was interested in ‘perv fam fun,’ a
reference to incestuous child molestation.”

- ICUii also disclosed to the FBI that a customer had
complained back in January 2007 that, in chatting with Lombard
on ICUii, “Lombard told the complainant that he ‘was into
incest’ and that he had adopted two African-American children.”

- “The complainant also explained that Frank Lombard described
himself, in his profile, as being a ‘perv dad for fun.’”

- CS said he met cooper2 about four years ago through ICUii
and they corresponded every few weeks, and CS had seen cooper2
“over webcam as many as one hundred times.”

- CS witnessed cooper2 “perform oral sex on an African-American
child who appeared to be under the age of ten, and [too graphic
to print], all of which activity was displayed to CS using the
individual’s webcam.”

- Cooper 2 also, according to CS, advised “that he lived in the
Raleigh/Durham area of North Carolina; that the child was an
adopted child, one of two adopted African-American children;
that he had a live-in gay male partner who did not participate
in the sexual abuse; and that he had allowed other individuals
to sexually molest the child.”

As the statement continues, Palchak says that he engaged in an
undercover operation using the online chat program Yahoo!
Instant Messenger and chatted with a person using the “display
name ‘F L.’” Sections of Palchak’s statement read:

- FL used the “photo share” feature of Yahoo! Instant Messenger
and sent to the detective “nude photos of himself, which
pictures match the North Carolina driver’s license photograph of
Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

- “User with the display name ‘F L’ stated that he had sexually
molested his adopted, male, African-American child who he had
adopted as an infant and is currently five-years old.”

- “He advised Your affiant [Palchak] in particular that the
child had performed oral sex on him, he had ‘fingered’ the
child, and that he had [too graphic to print].

- “He also advised … that he has met other pedophiles on the
program ICUii at times when he was willing to display his
adopted child on that program.”

- “He further stated that the abuse of the child was easier
when the child was too young to talk or know what was happening,
but that he had drugged the child with Benadryl during the
molestation.”

- “ ‘F L’ invited your affiant to fly to Durham this week in
order to have sexual contact with his 5-year-old adopted child.
‘F L’ stated to Your affiant that there would be no limits on
the sexual activity he could engage in with his 5-year-old
adopted child.”

- “During this conversation, ‘F L’ was fully visible over the
webcam, including his face. ‘F L’ is identical to the North
Carolina driver’s license photograph of Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

Lombard was arrested on June 24. He is charged with offering up
his 5-year-old adopted son for sex to other people (U.S. Code
Section 2422(a). The maximum penalty for such a crime is 20
years imprisonment.

One would think that the arrest of a prominent Duke University
official for such a heinous crime would spark a lot of major
media coverage. After all, this is the same Duke University that
the media (and Duke’s liberal faculty members) went batty over
with the lacrosse-rape story – a story based on one woman’s
unsubstantiated allegation, which quickly fell apart.

But that story was so politically correct – three young white
men allegedly rape a poor, young black woman in the South – the
maniacal liberal media would not let it go. It fit all their
stereotypes and their political agenda.

The gay and eco-friendly Frank Lombard who adopts black boys and
then allegedly sodomizes one of them on Web-cam does not fit the
liberal media’s stereotypes or their agenda.

Let’s look at the numbers. In the 15 days following Lombard’s
arrest, a search of the Nexis news service database (search term
“Frank Lombard” and “Duke University”) shows that 19 news
stories were published. Most of that coverage was in small,
local newspapers and was cursory.

In the 15 days that followed the arrest of two Duke lacrosse
players, on April 18, 2006, there were 1,056 news stories.
(Nexis search for “Duke University” and “lacrosse” and “rape.”)
(The third lacrosse player was not arrested until May 15.)

And in the few weeks prior to those arrests, following the
woman’s Mar. 14, 2006, claim that she was raped, there were an
additional 1,367 stories. All of that included extensive
coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News Channel,
National Public Radio, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, and all the
major newspapers and magazines. The coverage was wall-to-wall.

Yet a fairly prominent gay Duke University official is nabbed in
an FBI child-sex sting and there are 19 news stories. Two Duke
lacrosse players get arrested for supposedly raping a stripper
and there are more than 2,400 stories. There’s something wrong
with this picture.

Does anyone doubt that if a prominent straight man at Duke
University had adopted a young black girl and then sexually
abused her and broadcast the abuse over the Internet, it would
not be big news?

The coverage would again be wall-to-wall.

But here’s the reality. The liberal media support homosexuality.
Stories that in any way undermine the media’s rosy picture of
homosexuality are usually not given wide coverage.

Lombard lives in a sexually progressive commune with his gay
partner. A story that undermines the liberal image of the
committed gay couple – in this case, two highly educated Duke
university employees – living comfortably in suburbia is not to
be promoted.

Lombard adopted two black boys. A story that in any way taints
the liberal picture of gay adoption is not to be promoted, and
especially not promoted if the story has a race component (white
male father, black sons).

Lombard allegedly drugged one of his sons and then sexually
abused him on more than one occasion, and allegedly allowed
others to abuse the boy. A gay man drugging and sodomizing his
own son does not help advance the gay agenda, so it gets little
coverage.

At the same time, the story is so morally revolting it can only
taint anyone or anything associated with it – that includes Duke
University, Eno Commons, the city of Durham, the gay community
in general and the liberal media who rabidly covered the Duke
lacrosse scandal story.

Bottom line for liberal media: White males allegedly rape black
woman in the South equals politically correct story, lots of
coverage. Gay man adopts and then allegedly sodomizes his black
son equals politically incorrect story, very little coverage.

The good news in all this? The two children adopted by Lombard
are now with the North Carolina Department of Social Services.
Hopefully, they will get the counseling they need and, God
willing, a real mother and father to adopt them.

http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2009-0815-
laughable_double_standard.htm

--
For all you assbags who thought voting for that racist jackoff
Obama twice was such a great idea, this perverts' crimes are
your legacy.

Remind the racists at the DOJ about this homosexual white on
black baby crime the American liberal biased media is attempting
to obfuscate.

Email the Eric Holder ("report Zimmerman for racism" DOJ email
address) racist club at: ***@usdoj.gov.

[Norman Finkelstein]

In article <lft3jl$tse$***@news.mixmin.net>
Gronk <***@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
 
A Laughable Double Standard
The Duke University-Rape Case Nobody Knows About

Oliver Sykes
GUEST COLUMNIST

When the Duke University-lacrosse-rape story broke in the spring
of 2006, it sparked massive media coverage nationwide for more
than two years and endless liberal posturing about white
privilege vs. a disadvantaged black woman – three Duke lacrosse
players were charged with raping and kidnapping a black
stripper. It all turned out to be a lie, as we now know, and the
politically correct house of cards collapsed. The liberal media
quickly moved on with few regrets about a rush to judgment.

Now there is another Duke University-rape story with a strong
evidence trail of e-mails, photos, and videos, as well as
investigative work by the FBI, an Internet Crimes Against
Children task force, the State Bureau of Investigation, and
police forces in Washington, D.C. and in Durham, N.C. But this
time, the liberal media aren’t saying much.

That’s because this case involves a homosexual Duke University
official who does AIDS research; who lives with his partner in a
sexually liberated and eco-friendly housing community; who
adopted two black boys; who allegedly drugged and sodomized one
of the boys; who allegedly broadcast the sodomy online; and who
reportedly offered the 5-year-old boy up to other gay abusers on
the Internet.

This is not a politically correct storyline: ‘Gay White Duke
Official Rapes Adopted Black Boy.’ It doesn’t fit the liberal
worldview. ‘Angry White Male Rapes Black Girl’ does – but that’s
not the story here. Thus the meager media coverage. Let’s look
at what’s known so far.

Frank Lombard, 42, is the associate director of the Center for
Health Policy at Duke University where he does a lot of patients-
with-HIV/AIDS research and brings in grant money: for example,
$4 million in 2007. He also teaches undergraduate courses, as
listed for 2009, including “Introduction to the United States
Health Care System” and “Health Policy Analysis.”

Lombard lives at the Eno Commons with his partner Ken Shipp, a
pharmacist who also works at Duke doing HIV/AIDS research. Eno
Commons is a cohousing neighborhood in Durham, which was
developed by lesbian activist Sherri Zann Rosenthal, also the
assistant city attorney for Durham.

Enos Commons describes itself as “embracing diversity” and
welcoming to “residents of all ages, races, religious beliefs,
and affectional preferences.” It says it is open to lesbian,
gay, bisexual and/or transgender members and has no restrictions
on romantic relations between consenting adults. It also
describes itself as a “Paradise for Children” who “learn what
they live.”

The FBI, the police, and U.S. attorneys first learned about
Lombard through a “confidential source,” as explained in a sworn
statement by Detective Timothy Palchak, who works for the D.C.
Metropolitan Police Department, assigned to the Northern
Virginia Regional Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force.

The confidential source, or “CS,” was facing child pornography
charges and decided to cooperate with investigators about other
people involved “in the sexual abuse and molestation of
children.”

CS stated that he used the Internet-based video chat program
ICUii (I See You Too) to talk with a person with the user name
“cooper2” and “cooperse.” According to Palchak’s statement, the
following was determined:

- Officials with ICUii, under subpoena, “provided information
that the ICUii account of ‘cooper2’ belongs to Frank Lombard.”
ICUii “listed Frank Lombard’s email address” and his telephone
number, and also indicated “that Frank Lombard’s profile
description stated he was interested in ‘perv fam fun,’ a
reference to incestuous child molestation.”

- ICUii also disclosed to the FBI that a customer had
complained back in January 2007 that, in chatting with Lombard
on ICUii, “Lombard told the complainant that he ‘was into
incest’ and that he had adopted two African-American children.”

- “The complainant also explained that Frank Lombard described
himself, in his profile, as being a ‘perv dad for fun.’”

- CS said he met cooper2 about four years ago through ICUii
and they corresponded every few weeks, and CS had seen cooper2
“over webcam as many as one hundred times.”

- CS witnessed cooper2 “perform oral sex on an African-American
child who appeared to be under the age of ten, and [too graphic
to print], all of which activity was displayed to CS using the
individual’s webcam.”

- Cooper 2 also, according to CS, advised “that he lived in the
Raleigh/Durham area of North Carolina; that the child was an
adopted child, one of two adopted African-American children;
that he had a live-in gay male partner who did not participate
in the sexual abuse; and that he had allowed other individuals
to sexually molest the child.”

As the statement continues, Palchak says that he engaged in an
undercover operation using the online chat program Yahoo!
Instant Messenger and chatted with a person using the “display
name ‘F L.’” Sections of Palchak’s statement read:

- FL used the “photo share” feature of Yahoo! Instant Messenger
and sent to the detective “nude photos of himself, which
pictures match the North Carolina driver’s license photograph of
Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

- “User with the display name ‘F L’ stated that he had sexually
molested his adopted, male, African-American child who he had
adopted as an infant and is currently five-years old.”

- “He advised Your affiant [Palchak] in particular that the
child had performed oral sex on him, he had ‘fingered’ the
child, and that he had [too graphic to print].

- “He also advised … that he has met other pedophiles on the
program ICUii at times when he was willing to display his
adopted child on that program.”

- “He further stated that the abuse of the child was easier
when the child was too young to talk or know what was happening,
but that he had drugged the child with Benadryl during the
molestation.”

- “ ‘F L’ invited your affiant to fly to Durham this week in
order to have sexual contact with his 5-year-old adopted child.
‘F L’ stated to Your affiant that there would be no limits on
the sexual activity he could engage in with his 5-year-old
adopted child.”

- “During this conversation, ‘F L’ was fully visible over the
webcam, including his face. ‘F L’ is identical to the North
Carolina driver’s license photograph of Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

Lombard was arrested on June 24. He is charged with offering up
his 5-year-old adopted son for sex to other people (U.S. Code
Section 2422(a). The maximum penalty for such a crime is 20
years imprisonment.

One would think that the arrest of a prominent Duke University
official for such a heinous crime would spark a lot of major
media coverage. After all, this is the same Duke University that
the media (and Duke’s liberal faculty members) went batty over
with the lacrosse-rape story – a story based on one woman’s
unsubstantiated allegation, which quickly fell apart.

But that story was so politically correct – three young white
men allegedly rape a poor, young black woman in the South – the
maniacal liberal media would not let it go. It fit all their
stereotypes and their political agenda.

The gay and eco-friendly Frank Lombard who adopts black boys and
then allegedly sodomizes one of them on Web-cam does not fit the
liberal media’s stereotypes or their agenda.

Let’s look at the numbers. In the 15 days following Lombard’s
arrest, a search of the Nexis news service database (search term
“Frank Lombard” and “Duke University”) shows that 19 news
stories were published. Most of that coverage was in small,
local newspapers and was cursory.

In the 15 days that followed the arrest of two Duke lacrosse
players, on April 18, 2006, there were 1,056 news stories.
(Nexis search for “Duke University” and “lacrosse” and “rape.”)
(The third lacrosse player was not arrested until May 15.)

And in the few weeks prior to those arrests, following the
woman’s Mar. 14, 2006, claim that she was raped, there were an
additional 1,367 stories. All of that included extensive
coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News Channel,
National Public Radio, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, and all the
major newspapers and magazines. The coverage was wall-to-wall.

Yet a fairly prominent gay Duke University official is nabbed in
an FBI child-sex sting and there are 19 news stories. Two Duke
lacrosse players get arrested for supposedly raping a stripper
and there are more than 2,400 stories. There’s something wrong
with this picture.

Does anyone doubt that if a prominent straight man at Duke
University had adopted a young black girl and then sexually
abused her and broadcast the abuse over the Internet, it would
not be big news?

The coverage would again be wall-to-wall.

But here’s the reality. The liberal media support homosexuality.
Stories that in any way undermine the media’s rosy picture of
homosexuality are usually not given wide coverage.

Lombard lives in a sexually progressive commune with his gay
partner. A story that undermines the liberal image of the
committed gay couple – in this case, two highly educated Duke
university employees – living comfortably in suburbia is not to
be promoted.

Lombard adopted two black boys. A story that in any way taints
the liberal picture of gay adoption is not to be promoted, and
especially not promoted if the story has a race component (white
male father, black sons).

Lombard allegedly drugged one of his sons and then sexually
abused him on more than one occasion, and allegedly allowed
others to abuse the boy. A gay man drugging and sodomizing his
own son does not help advance the gay agenda, so it gets little
coverage.

At the same time, the story is so morally revolting it can only
taint anyone or anything associated with it – that includes Duke
University, Eno Commons, the city of Durham, the gay community
in general and the liberal media who rabidly covered the Duke
lacrosse scandal story.

Bottom line for liberal media: White males allegedly rape black
woman in the South equals politically correct story, lots of
coverage. Gay man adopts and then allegedly sodomizes his black
son equals politically incorrect story, very little coverage.

The good news in all this? The two children adopted by Lombard
are now with the North Carolina Department of Social Services.
Hopefully, they will get the counseling they need and, God
willing, a real mother and father to adopt them.

http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2009-0815-
laughable_double_standard.htm

--
For all you assbags who thought voting for that racist jackoff
Obama twice was such a great idea, this perverts' crimes are
your legacy.

Remind the racists at the DOJ about this homosexual white on
black baby crime the American liberal biased media is attempting
to obfuscate.

Email the Eric Holder ("report Zimmerman for racism" DOJ email
address) racist club at: ***@usdoj.gov.

[Norman Finkelstein]

In article <f38c5a1b-cf19-4390-a2a1-
***@googlegroups.com>
wy <***@myself.com> wrote:
 
A Laughable Double Standard
The Duke University-Rape Case Nobody Knows About

Oliver Sykes
GUEST COLUMNIST

When the Duke University-lacrosse-rape story broke in the spring
of 2006, it sparked massive media coverage nationwide for more
than two years and endless liberal posturing about white
privilege vs. a disadvantaged black woman – three Duke lacrosse
players were charged with raping and kidnapping a black
stripper. It all turned out to be a lie, as we now know, and the
politically correct house of cards collapsed. The liberal media
quickly moved on with few regrets about a rush to judgment.

Now there is another Duke University-rape story with a strong
evidence trail of e-mails, photos, and videos, as well as
investigative work by the FBI, an Internet Crimes Against
Children task force, the State Bureau of Investigation, and
police forces in Washington, D.C. and in Durham, N.C. But this
time, the liberal media aren’t saying much.

That’s because this case involves a homosexual Duke University
official who does AIDS research; who lives with his partner in a
sexually liberated and eco-friendly housing community; who
adopted two black boys; who allegedly drugged and sodomized one
of the boys; who allegedly broadcast the sodomy online; and who
reportedly offered the 5-year-old boy up to other gay abusers on
the Internet.

This is not a politically correct storyline: ‘Gay White Duke
Official Rapes Adopted Black Boy.’ It doesn’t fit the liberal
worldview. ‘Angry White Male Rapes Black Girl’ does – but that’s
not the story here. Thus the meager media coverage. Let’s look
at what’s known so far.

Frank Lombard, 42, is the associate director of the Center for
Health Policy at Duke University where he does a lot of patients-
with-HIV/AIDS research and brings in grant money: for example,
$4 million in 2007. He also teaches undergraduate courses, as
listed for 2009, including “Introduction to the United States
Health Care System” and “Health Policy Analysis.”

Lombard lives at the Eno Commons with his partner Ken Shipp, a
pharmacist who also works at Duke doing HIV/AIDS research. Eno
Commons is a cohousing neighborhood in Durham, which was
developed by lesbian activist Sherri Zann Rosenthal, also the
assistant city attorney for Durham.

Enos Commons describes itself as “embracing diversity” and
welcoming to “residents of all ages, races, religious beliefs,
and affectional preferences.” It says it is open to lesbian,
gay, bisexual and/or transgender members and has no restrictions
on romantic relations between consenting adults. It also
describes itself as a “Paradise for Children” who “learn what
they live.”

The FBI, the police, and U.S. attorneys first learned about
Lombard through a “confidential source,” as explained in a sworn
statement by Detective Timothy Palchak, who works for the D.C.
Metropolitan Police Department, assigned to the Northern
Virginia Regional Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force.

The confidential source, or “CS,” was facing child pornography
charges and decided to cooperate with investigators about other
people involved “in the sexual abuse and molestation of
children.”

CS stated that he used the Internet-based video chat program
ICUii (I See You Too) to talk with a person with the user name
“cooper2” and “cooperse.” According to Palchak’s statement, the
following was determined:

- Officials with ICUii, under subpoena, “provided information
that the ICUii account of ‘cooper2’ belongs to Frank Lombard.”
ICUii “listed Frank Lombard’s email address” and his telephone
number, and also indicated “that Frank Lombard’s profile
description stated he was interested in ‘perv fam fun,’ a
reference to incestuous child molestation.”

- ICUii also disclosed to the FBI that a customer had
complained back in January 2007 that, in chatting with Lombard
on ICUii, “Lombard told the complainant that he ‘was into
incest’ and that he had adopted two African-American children.”

- “The complainant also explained that Frank Lombard described
himself, in his profile, as being a ‘perv dad for fun.’”

- CS said he met cooper2 about four years ago through ICUii
and they corresponded every few weeks, and CS had seen cooper2
“over webcam as many as one hundred times.”

- CS witnessed cooper2 “perform oral sex on an African-American
child who appeared to be under the age of ten, and [too graphic
to print], all of which activity was displayed to CS using the
individual’s webcam.”

- Cooper 2 also, according to CS, advised “that he lived in the
Raleigh/Durham area of North Carolina; that the child was an
adopted child, one of two adopted African-American children;
that he had a live-in gay male partner who did not participate
in the sexual abuse; and that he had allowed other individuals
to sexually molest the child.”

As the statement continues, Palchak says that he engaged in an
undercover operation using the online chat program Yahoo!
Instant Messenger and chatted with a person using the “display
name ‘F L.’” Sections of Palchak’s statement read:

- FL used the “photo share” feature of Yahoo! Instant Messenger
and sent to the detective “nude photos of himself, which
pictures match the North Carolina driver’s license photograph of
Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

- “User with the display name ‘F L’ stated that he had sexually
molested his adopted, male, African-American child who he had
adopted as an infant and is currently five-years old.”

- “He advised Your affiant [Palchak] in particular that the
child had performed oral sex on him, he had ‘fingered’ the
child, and that he had [too graphic to print].

- “He also advised … that he has met other pedophiles on the
program ICUii at times when he was willing to display his
adopted child on that program.”

- “He further stated that the abuse of the child was easier
when the child was too young to talk or know what was happening,
but that he had drugged the child with Benadryl during the
molestation.”

- “ ‘F L’ invited your affiant to fly to Durham this week in
order to have sexual contact with his 5-year-old adopted child.
‘F L’ stated to Your affiant that there would be no limits on
the sexual activity he could engage in with his 5-year-old
adopted child.”

- “During this conversation, ‘F L’ was fully visible over the
webcam, including his face. ‘F L’ is identical to the North
Carolina driver’s license photograph of Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

Lombard was arrested on June 24. He is charged with offering up
his 5-year-old adopted son for sex to other people (U.S. Code
Section 2422(a). The maximum penalty for such a crime is 20
years imprisonment.

One would think that the arrest of a prominent Duke University
official for such a heinous crime would spark a lot of major
media coverage. After all, this is the same Duke University that
the media (and Duke’s liberal faculty members) went batty over
with the lacrosse-rape story – a story based on one woman’s
unsubstantiated allegation, which quickly fell apart.

But that story was so politically correct – three young white
men allegedly rape a poor, young black woman in the South – the
maniacal liberal media would not let it go. It fit all their
stereotypes and their political agenda.

The gay and eco-friendly Frank Lombard who adopts black boys and
then allegedly sodomizes one of them on Web-cam does not fit the
liberal media’s stereotypes or their agenda.

Let’s look at the numbers. In the 15 days following Lombard’s
arrest, a search of the Nexis news service database (search term
“Frank Lombard” and “Duke University”) shows that 19 news
stories were published. Most of that coverage was in small,
local newspapers and was cursory.

In the 15 days that followed the arrest of two Duke lacrosse
players, on April 18, 2006, there were 1,056 news stories.
(Nexis search for “Duke University” and “lacrosse” and “rape.”)
(The third lacrosse player was not arrested until May 15.)

And in the few weeks prior to those arrests, following the
woman’s Mar. 14, 2006, claim that she was raped, there were an
additional 1,367 stories. All of that included extensive
coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News Channel,
National Public Radio, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, and all the
major newspapers and magazines. The coverage was wall-to-wall.

Yet a fairly prominent gay Duke University official is nabbed in
an FBI child-sex sting and there are 19 news stories. Two Duke
lacrosse players get arrested for supposedly raping a stripper
and there are more than 2,400 stories. There’s something wrong
with this picture.

Does anyone doubt that if a prominent straight man at Duke
University had adopted a young black girl and then sexually
abused her and broadcast the abuse over the Internet, it would
not be big news?

The coverage would again be wall-to-wall.

But here’s the reality. The liberal media support homosexuality.
Stories that in any way undermine the media’s rosy picture of
homosexuality are usually not given wide coverage.

Lombard lives in a sexually progressive commune with his gay
partner. A story that undermines the liberal image of the
committed gay couple – in this case, two highly educated Duke
university employees – living comfortably in suburbia is not to
be promoted.

Lombard adopted two black boys. A story that in any way taints
the liberal picture of gay adoption is not to be promoted, and
especially not promoted if the story has a race component (white
male father, black sons).

Lombard allegedly drugged one of his sons and then sexually
abused him on more than one occasion, and allegedly allowed
others to abuse the boy. A gay man drugging and sodomizing his
own son does not help advance the gay agenda, so it gets little
coverage.

At the same time, the story is so morally revolting it can only
taint anyone or anything associated with it – that includes Duke
University, Eno Commons, the city of Durham, the gay community
in general and the liberal media who rabidly covered the Duke
lacrosse scandal story.

Bottom line for liberal media: White males allegedly rape black
woman in the South equals politically correct story, lots of
coverage. Gay man adopts and then allegedly sodomizes his black
son equals politically incorrect story, very little coverage.

The good news in all this? The two children adopted by Lombard
are now with the North Carolina Department of Social Services.
Hopefully, they will get the counseling they need and, God
willing, a real mother and father to adopt them.

http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2009-0815-
laughable_double_standard.htm

--
For all you assbags who thought voting for that racist jackoff
Obama twice was such a great idea, this perverts' crimes are
your legacy.

Remind the racists at the DOJ about this homosexual white on
black baby crime the American liberal biased media is attempting
to obfuscate.

Email the Eric Holder ("report Zimmerman for racism" DOJ email
address) racist club at: ***@usdoj.gov.

[Norman Finkelstein]

In article <***@news.eternal-september.org>
"BeeSting Alergy" <***@aol.com> wrote:
 
A Laughable Double Standard
The Duke University-Rape Case Nobody Knows About

Oliver Sykes
GUEST COLUMNIST

When the Duke University-lacrosse-rape story broke in the spring
of 2006, it sparked massive media coverage nationwide for more
than two years and endless liberal posturing about white
privilege vs. a disadvantaged black woman – three Duke lacrosse
players were charged with raping and kidnapping a black
stripper. It all turned out to be a lie, as we now know, and the
politically correct house of cards collapsed. The liberal media
quickly moved on with few regrets about a rush to judgment.

Now there is another Duke University-rape story with a strong
evidence trail of e-mails, photos, and videos, as well as
investigative work by the FBI, an Internet Crimes Against
Children task force, the State Bureau of Investigation, and
police forces in Washington, D.C. and in Durham, N.C. But this
time, the liberal media aren’t saying much.

That’s because this case involves a homosexual Duke University
official who does AIDS research; who lives with his partner in a
sexually liberated and eco-friendly housing community; who
adopted two black boys; who allegedly drugged and sodomized one
of the boys; who allegedly broadcast the sodomy online; and who
reportedly offered the 5-year-old boy up to other gay abusers on
the Internet.

This is not a politically correct storyline: ‘Gay White Duke
Official Rapes Adopted Black Boy.’ It doesn’t fit the liberal
worldview. ‘Angry White Male Rapes Black Girl’ does – but that’s
not the story here. Thus the meager media coverage. Let’s look
at what’s known so far.

Frank Lombard, 42, is the associate director of the Center for
Health Policy at Duke University where he does a lot of patients-
with-HIV/AIDS research and brings in grant money: for example,
$4 million in 2007. He also teaches undergraduate courses, as
listed for 2009, including “Introduction to the United States
Health Care System” and “Health Policy Analysis.”

Lombard lives at the Eno Commons with his partner Ken Shipp, a
pharmacist who also works at Duke doing HIV/AIDS research. Eno
Commons is a cohousing neighborhood in Durham, which was
developed by lesbian activist Sherri Zann Rosenthal, also the
assistant city attorney for Durham.

Enos Commons describes itself as “embracing diversity” and
welcoming to “residents of all ages, races, religious beliefs,
and affectional preferences.” It says it is open to lesbian,
gay, bisexual and/or transgender members and has no restrictions
on romantic relations between consenting adults. It also
describes itself as a “Paradise for Children” who “learn what
they live.”

The FBI, the police, and U.S. attorneys first learned about
Lombard through a “confidential source,” as explained in a sworn
statement by Detective Timothy Palchak, who works for the D.C.
Metropolitan Police Department, assigned to the Northern
Virginia Regional Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force.

The confidential source, or “CS,” was facing child pornography
charges and decided to cooperate with investigators about other
people involved “in the sexual abuse and molestation of
children.”

CS stated that he used the Internet-based video chat program
ICUii (I See You Too) to talk with a person with the user name
“cooper2” and “cooperse.” According to Palchak’s statement, the
following was determined:

- Officials with ICUii, under subpoena, “provided information
that the ICUii account of ‘cooper2’ belongs to Frank Lombard.”
ICUii “listed Frank Lombard’s email address” and his telephone
number, and also indicated “that Frank Lombard’s profile
description stated he was interested in ‘perv fam fun,’ a
reference to incestuous child molestation.”

- ICUii also disclosed to the FBI that a customer had
complained back in January 2007 that, in chatting with Lombard
on ICUii, “Lombard told the complainant that he ‘was into
incest’ and that he had adopted two African-American children.”

- “The complainant also explained that Frank Lombard described
himself, in his profile, as being a ‘perv dad for fun.’”

- CS said he met cooper2 about four years ago through ICUii
and they corresponded every few weeks, and CS had seen cooper2
“over webcam as many as one hundred times.”

- CS witnessed cooper2 “perform oral sex on an African-American
child who appeared to be under the age of ten, and [too graphic
to print], all of which activity was displayed to CS using the
individual’s webcam.”

- Cooper 2 also, according to CS, advised “that he lived in the
Raleigh/Durham area of North Carolina; that the child was an
adopted child, one of two adopted African-American children;
that he had a live-in gay male partner who did not participate
in the sexual abuse; and that he had allowed other individuals
to sexually molest the child.”

As the statement continues, Palchak says that he engaged in an
undercover operation using the online chat program Yahoo!
Instant Messenger and chatted with a person using the “display
name ‘F L.’” Sections of Palchak’s statement read:

- FL used the “photo share” feature of Yahoo! Instant Messenger
and sent to the detective “nude photos of himself, which
pictures match the North Carolina driver’s license photograph of
Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

- “User with the display name ‘F L’ stated that he had sexually
molested his adopted, male, African-American child who he had
adopted as an infant and is currently five-years old.”

- “He advised Your affiant [Palchak] in particular that the
child had performed oral sex on him, he had ‘fingered’ the
child, and that he had [too graphic to print].

- “He also advised … that he has met other pedophiles on the
program ICUii at times when he was willing to display his
adopted child on that program.”

- “He further stated that the abuse of the child was easier
when the child was too young to talk or know what was happening,
but that he had drugged the child with Benadryl during the
molestation.”

- “ ‘F L’ invited your affiant to fly to Durham this week in
order to have sexual contact with his 5-year-old adopted child.
‘F L’ stated to Your affiant that there would be no limits on
the sexual activity he could engage in with his 5-year-old
adopted child.”

- “During this conversation, ‘F L’ was fully visible over the
webcam, including his face. ‘F L’ is identical to the North
Carolina driver’s license photograph of Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

Lombard was arrested on June 24. He is charged with offering up
his 5-year-old adopted son for sex to other people (U.S. Code
Section 2422(a). The maximum penalty for such a crime is 20
years imprisonment.

One would think that the arrest of a prominent Duke University
official for such a heinous crime would spark a lot of major
media coverage. After all, this is the same Duke University that
the media (and Duke’s liberal faculty members) went batty over
with the lacrosse-rape story – a story based on one woman’s
unsubstantiated allegation, which quickly fell apart.

But that story was so politically correct – three young white
men allegedly rape a poor, young black woman in the South – the
maniacal liberal media would not let it go. It fit all their
stereotypes and their political agenda.

The gay and eco-friendly Frank Lombard who adopts black boys and
then allegedly sodomizes one of them on Web-cam does not fit the
liberal media’s stereotypes or their agenda.

Let’s look at the numbers. In the 15 days following Lombard’s
arrest, a search of the Nexis news service database (search term
“Frank Lombard” and “Duke University”) shows that 19 news
stories were published. Most of that coverage was in small,
local newspapers and was cursory.

In the 15 days that followed the arrest of two Duke lacrosse
players, on April 18, 2006, there were 1,056 news stories.
(Nexis search for “Duke University” and “lacrosse” and “rape.”)
(The third lacrosse player was not arrested until May 15.)

And in the few weeks prior to those arrests, following the
woman’s Mar. 14, 2006, claim that she was raped, there were an
additional 1,367 stories. All of that included extensive
coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News Channel,
National Public Radio, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, and all the
major newspapers and magazines. The coverage was wall-to-wall.

Yet a fairly prominent gay Duke University official is nabbed in
an FBI child-sex sting and there are 19 news stories. Two Duke
lacrosse players get arrested for supposedly raping a stripper
and there are more than 2,400 stories. There’s something wrong
with this picture.

Does anyone doubt that if a prominent straight man at Duke
University had adopted a young black girl and then sexually
abused her and broadcast the abuse over the Internet, it would
not be big news?

The coverage would again be wall-to-wall.

But here’s the reality. The liberal media support homosexuality.
Stories that in any way undermine the media’s rosy picture of
homosexuality are usually not given wide coverage.

Lombard lives in a sexually progressive commune with his gay
partner. A story that undermines the liberal image of the
committed gay couple – in this case, two highly educated Duke
university employees – living comfortably in suburbia is not to
be promoted.

Lombard adopted two black boys. A story that in any way taints
the liberal picture of gay adoption is not to be promoted, and
especially not promoted if the story has a race component (white
male father, black sons).

Lombard allegedly drugged one of his sons and then sexually
abused him on more than one occasion, and allegedly allowed
others to abuse the boy. A gay man drugging and sodomizing his
own son does not help advance the gay agenda, so it gets little
coverage.

At the same time, the story is so morally revolting it can only
taint anyone or anything associated with it – that includes Duke
University, Eno Commons, the city of Durham, the gay community
in general and the liberal media who rabidly covered the Duke
lacrosse scandal story.

Bottom line for liberal media: White males allegedly rape black
woman in the South equals politically correct story, lots of
coverage. Gay man adopts and then allegedly sodomizes his black
son equals politically incorrect story, very little coverage.

The good news in all this? The two children adopted by Lombard
are now with the North Carolina Department of Social Services.
Hopefully, they will get the counseling they need and, God
willing, a real mother and father to adopt them.

http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2009-0815-
laughable_double_standard.htm

--
For all you assbags who thought voting for that racist jackoff
Obama twice was such a great idea, this perverts' crimes are
your legacy.

Remind the racists at the DOJ about this homosexual white on
black baby crime the American liberal biased media is attempting
to obfuscate.

Email the Eric Holder ("report Zimmerman for racism" DOJ email
address) racist club at: ***@usdoj.gov.

[Norman Finkelstein]

In article <lg02iv$s6p$***@dont-email.me>
"David 1950" <***@eternalsep.net> wrote:
 
A Laughable Double Standard
The Duke University-Rape Case Nobody Knows About

Oliver Sykes
GUEST COLUMNIST

When the Duke University-lacrosse-rape story broke in the spring
of 2006, it sparked massive media coverage nationwide for more
than two years and endless liberal posturing about white
privilege vs. a disadvantaged black woman – three Duke lacrosse
players were charged with raping and kidnapping a black
stripper. It all turned out to be a lie, as we now know, and the
politically correct house of cards collapsed. The liberal media
quickly moved on with few regrets about a rush to judgment.

Now there is another Duke University-rape story with a strong
evidence trail of e-mails, photos, and videos, as well as
investigative work by the FBI, an Internet Crimes Against
Children task force, the State Bureau of Investigation, and
police forces in Washington, D.C. and in Durham, N.C. But this
time, the liberal media aren’t saying much.

That’s because this case involves a homosexual Duke University
official who does AIDS research; who lives with his partner in a
sexually liberated and eco-friendly housing community; who
adopted two black boys; who allegedly drugged and sodomized one
of the boys; who allegedly broadcast the sodomy online; and who
reportedly offered the 5-year-old boy up to other gay abusers on
the Internet.

This is not a politically correct storyline: ‘Gay White Duke
Official Rapes Adopted Black Boy.’ It doesn’t fit the liberal
worldview. ‘Angry White Male Rapes Black Girl’ does – but that’s
not the story here. Thus the meager media coverage. Let’s look
at what’s known so far.

Frank Lombard, 42, is the associate director of the Center for
Health Policy at Duke University where he does a lot of patients-
with-HIV/AIDS research and brings in grant money: for example,
$4 million in 2007. He also teaches undergraduate courses, as
listed for 2009, including “Introduction to the United States
Health Care System” and “Health Policy Analysis.”

Lombard lives at the Eno Commons with his partner Ken Shipp, a
pharmacist who also works at Duke doing HIV/AIDS research. Eno
Commons is a cohousing neighborhood in Durham, which was
developed by lesbian activist Sherri Zann Rosenthal, also the
assistant city attorney for Durham.

Enos Commons describes itself as “embracing diversity” and
welcoming to “residents of all ages, races, religious beliefs,
and affectional preferences.” It says it is open to lesbian,
gay, bisexual and/or transgender members and has no restrictions
on romantic relations between consenting adults. It also
describes itself as a “Paradise for Children” who “learn what
they live.”

The FBI, the police, and U.S. attorneys first learned about
Lombard through a “confidential source,” as explained in a sworn
statement by Detective Timothy Palchak, who works for the D.C.
Metropolitan Police Department, assigned to the Northern
Virginia Regional Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force.

The confidential source, or “CS,” was facing child pornography
charges and decided to cooperate with investigators about other
people involved “in the sexual abuse and molestation of
children.”

CS stated that he used the Internet-based video chat program
ICUii (I See You Too) to talk with a person with the user name
“cooper2” and “cooperse.” According to Palchak’s statement, the
following was determined:

- Officials with ICUii, under subpoena, “provided information
that the ICUii account of ‘cooper2’ belongs to Frank Lombard.”
ICUii “listed Frank Lombard’s email address” and his telephone
number, and also indicated “that Frank Lombard’s profile
description stated he was interested in ‘perv fam fun,’ a
reference to incestuous child molestation.”

- ICUii also disclosed to the FBI that a customer had
complained back in January 2007 that, in chatting with Lombard
on ICUii, “Lombard told the complainant that he ‘was into
incest’ and that he had adopted two African-American children.”

- “The complainant also explained that Frank Lombard described
himself, in his profile, as being a ‘perv dad for fun.’”

- CS said he met cooper2 about four years ago through ICUii
and they corresponded every few weeks, and CS had seen cooper2
“over webcam as many as one hundred times.”

- CS witnessed cooper2 “perform oral sex on an African-American
child who appeared to be under the age of ten, and [too graphic
to print], all of which activity was displayed to CS using the
individual’s webcam.”

- Cooper 2 also, according to CS, advised “that he lived in the
Raleigh/Durham area of North Carolina; that the child was an
adopted child, one of two adopted African-American children;
that he had a live-in gay male partner who did not participate
in the sexual abuse; and that he had allowed other individuals
to sexually molest the child.”

As the statement continues, Palchak says that he engaged in an
undercover operation using the online chat program Yahoo!
Instant Messenger and chatted with a person using the “display
name ‘F L.’” Sections of Palchak’s statement read:

- FL used the “photo share” feature of Yahoo! Instant Messenger
and sent to the detective “nude photos of himself, which
pictures match the North Carolina driver’s license photograph of
Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

- “User with the display name ‘F L’ stated that he had sexually
molested his adopted, male, African-American child who he had
adopted as an infant and is currently five-years old.”

- “He advised Your affiant [Palchak] in particular that the
child had performed oral sex on him, he had ‘fingered’ the
child, and that he had [too graphic to print].

- “He also advised … that he has met other pedophiles on the
program ICUii at times when he was willing to display his
adopted child on that program.”

- “He further stated that the abuse of the child was easier
when the child was too young to talk or know what was happening,
but that he had drugged the child with Benadryl during the
molestation.”

- “ ‘F L’ invited your affiant to fly to Durham this week in
order to have sexual contact with his 5-year-old adopted child.
‘F L’ stated to Your affiant that there would be no limits on
the sexual activity he could engage in with his 5-year-old
adopted child.”

- “During this conversation, ‘F L’ was fully visible over the
webcam, including his face. ‘F L’ is identical to the North
Carolina driver’s license photograph of Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

Lombard was arrested on June 24. He is charged with offering up
his 5-year-old adopted son for sex to other people (U.S. Code
Section 2422(a). The maximum penalty for such a crime is 20
years imprisonment.

One would think that the arrest of a prominent Duke University
official for such a heinous crime would spark a lot of major
media coverage. After all, this is the same Duke University that
the media (and Duke’s liberal faculty members) went batty over
with the lacrosse-rape story – a story based on one woman’s
unsubstantiated allegation, which quickly fell apart.

But that story was so politically correct – three young white
men allegedly rape a poor, young black woman in the South – the
maniacal liberal media would not let it go. It fit all their
stereotypes and their political agenda.

The gay and eco-friendly Frank Lombard who adopts black boys and
then allegedly sodomizes one of them on Web-cam does not fit the
liberal media’s stereotypes or their agenda.

Let’s look at the numbers. In the 15 days following Lombard’s
arrest, a search of the Nexis news service database (search term
“Frank Lombard” and “Duke University”) shows that 19 news
stories were published. Most of that coverage was in small,
local newspapers and was cursory.

In the 15 days that followed the arrest of two Duke lacrosse
players, on April 18, 2006, there were 1,056 news stories.
(Nexis search for “Duke University” and “lacrosse” and “rape.”)
(The third lacrosse player was not arrested until May 15.)

And in the few weeks prior to those arrests, following the
woman’s Mar. 14, 2006, claim that she was raped, there were an
additional 1,367 stories. All of that included extensive
coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News Channel,
National Public Radio, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, and all the
major newspapers and magazines. The coverage was wall-to-wall.

Yet a fairly prominent gay Duke University official is nabbed in
an FBI child-sex sting and there are 19 news stories. Two Duke
lacrosse players get arrested for supposedly raping a stripper
and there are more than 2,400 stories. There’s something wrong
with this picture.

Does anyone doubt that if a prominent straight man at Duke
University had adopted a young black girl and then sexually
abused her and broadcast the abuse over the Internet, it would
not be big news?

The coverage would again be wall-to-wall.

But here’s the reality. The liberal media support homosexuality.
Stories that in any way undermine the media’s rosy picture of
homosexuality are usually not given wide coverage.

Lombard lives in a sexually progressive commune with his gay
partner. A story that undermines the liberal image of the
committed gay couple – in this case, two highly educated Duke
university employees – living comfortably in suburbia is not to
be promoted.

Lombard adopted two black boys. A story that in any way taints
the liberal picture of gay adoption is not to be promoted, and
especially not promoted if the story has a race component (white
male father, black sons).

Lombard allegedly drugged one of his sons and then sexually
abused him on more than one occasion, and allegedly allowed
others to abuse the boy. A gay man drugging and sodomizing his
own son does not help advance the gay agenda, so it gets little
coverage.

At the same time, the story is so morally revolting it can only
taint anyone or anything associated with it – that includes Duke
University, Eno Commons, the city of Durham, the gay community
in general and the liberal media who rabidly covered the Duke
lacrosse scandal story.

Bottom line for liberal media: White males allegedly rape black
woman in the South equals politically correct story, lots of
coverage. Gay man adopts and then allegedly sodomizes his black
son equals politically incorrect story, very little coverage.

The good news in all this? The two children adopted by Lombard
are now with the North Carolina Department of Social Services.
Hopefully, they will get the counseling they need and, God
willing, a real mother and father to adopt them.

http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2009-0815-
laughable_double_standard.htm

--
For all you assbags who thought voting for that racist jackoff
Obama twice was such a great idea, this perverts' crimes are
your legacy.

Remind the racists at the DOJ about this homosexual white on
black baby crime the American liberal biased media is attempting
to obfuscate.

Email the Eric Holder ("report Zimmerman for racism" DOJ email
address) racist club at: ***@usdoj.gov.